☛ The Creative Section of April issue (Vol. 6, No. 2) will be out on or before 25 May, 2025.
☛ Colleges/Universities may contact us for publication of their conference/seminar papers at creativeflightjournal@gmail.com

Ecofeminist Perspective: The Struggle to Preserve the Environment in Vandana Shiva’s Staying Alive

 


Ecofeminist Perspective: The Struggle to Preserve the Environment in Vandana Shiva’s Staying Alive

 

Yamini Goyal

Ph.D. Scholar

IMS Unison University

Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

 

 

Abstract: Ecofeminism theory investigates femininity, ecology, patriarchy, colonization, and the interconnection between women and the natural environment. This study articulates how rural Indian women played a vital role in the past and their long struggle to conserve the natural resources that catastrophes due to urbanization and development projects of postcolonialism. This research further examines the overview of the ecofeminist perspective and Western patriarchy that destroy the ecology and create disbalance in nature. Renowned environmentalist Vandana Shiva advocates agriculture and environmental protection. She also supports fair trade, organic farming, and women’s rights. The work of Vandana Shiva’s “Staying Alive” reflects the ecological crisis and the domination of women and throws light on social justice, gender equality, and ethnicity. She promotes the indigenous tradition system of environmental sustainability, which started after the colonial period and continued post-independence, that is empirically represented in literature. Women of the third world have the mastery to conserve human and non-human life, and their actions make survival possible. Women have ecological knowledge in forestry to save trees from government loggers and create the link between forests and women, highlighting the deeper meaning of femininity and prakriti. Women in India initiated the Chipko movement to banish anthropocentrism and promote ecocentrism.

 

Keywords: Patriarchy, Colonization, Postcolonialism, Anthropocentrism, Ecocentrism, Ecofeminism, Sustainability, Indigenous Tradition system

 

Introduction

 

French philosopher Françoise d'Eaubonne coined the term "ecofeminism" in her influential book “Le Féminismeou la Mort,” published in 1974. The work emphasizes the oppression and domination of both women and nature by the Western patriarchal world for the sake of the modern capitalist development model. There is a notable equivalence of nurture and protection between women and the environment, as highlighted by ecofeminists, and they identify a connection between these issues of degradation, exploitation, fear, and violence stemming from patriarchal thinking. The principles of Francois have already been stated in 1962 by Rachel Carson in “Silent Spring,” a masterpiece of the ecocritical movement. In this work, she warns against the use of pesticides in agriculture and challenges the industrial world. “If we are going to live so intimately with these chemicals—eating and drinking them, taking them into the very marrow of our bones—we had better know something about their nature and their power” (Carson, 17)

The major impact of industrial technology and capitalism is that several species were wiped out from the earth, and only the needs and desires of a male-dominated society are virtually everywhere. Violence against women has been noticed in militarism and the death-counter weapon industry, which threaten women as well as nature. (Y. King, "The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology.")

 

Women have participated in environmental movements to preserve natural phenomena since the late nineteenth century. They have incorporated local culture, embraced their role as Mother Nature, and demonstrated their significance in the context of Western colonization beliefs. Development for improved well-being by westernization of economic categories, industrialization, and capitalism as patriarchal projects of men occurred in Europe during the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries. These projects brought poverty and dispossession not only for local women but also for peasants and tribals who were involved in this struggle as victims of modern technological development and the scientific paradigm, and they fought for liberation from colonization.

 

Development is the reason for inequality between males and females, the domination of men over nature and women, and the degrading of those who are life's support system. Women are central, admirable, and nurturing to the feminine principles. They spend their energy and time gathering water, food, and fuel, and similarly, nature’s power works as the donor of all necessities; both entities are creator and preserver, but patriarchal power uses women’s survival economy and nature’s economy. Indian rural women demonstrated determination and dedication through numerous acts of sacrifice. The Chipko movement, the greatest exemplar of humanity and deep concern for the environment, was led by the legendary Gaura Devi alongside indigenous people. Ramachandra Guha highlighted the peasants’ struggle against government control over forests and focused on environmental history and the Chipko movement in Uttarakhand. (“The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in Himalayas, 1989)

 

“Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development (1988)’’

 

Vandana Shiva is strongly influenced by Indian farmers and plays a major role in the global ecofeminist movement. She was inspired by the Chipko Movement and dedicated this writing to her mother, who was a farmer. She explores the interconnection between women's oppression, ecological degradation, and Western models of development and highlights the essential role of women in environmental protection and sustainable development. According to her, men use modern science and treat women and nature as slaves, which lead to social inequalities. She emphasizes her doubt that, according to patriarchal projects, the forest is merely a source for industries but not a part of an ecosystem for scientific Western models. ‘Feminism as ecology and ecology as the revival of Prakriti, the source of all life, become the decentred powers of political and economic transformation and restructuring.’(Shiva, 6).

 

Shiva explains that Indian women, particularly in rural communities, have high knowledge of the environment and make efforts for sustainability, such as gathering food as farmers and considering the forest as their mother because forests feed them, help them to maintain livestock, provide wood for burning, and provide many herbs for medicine, whereas patriarchy practiced mal-development in which they didn't respect diversity. They started exploiting and neglecting Indigenous knowledge and the importance of women and tribal communities. They came with scientific forestry based on profit maximization and degradation of natural resources. Ecological crises can be resolved by using traditional sustainable methods that are practiced by third-world women. She supports and respects the traditions and practices of the indigenous community. She also indicates the danger of our highly conceptual and transaction-focused society and says that the entire environmental crisis has its roots in modern science and the reductionist thinking of a patriarchal society. The key theme of this work is “maldevelopment,” which she throws light on as a development that is ruinous, unsustainable, and disconnected from the needs of local people. ‘Maldevelopment is the violation of the integrity of organic, interconnected, and interdependent systems that set in motion a process of exploitation, inequality, injustice, and violence.’ (Shiva, 5)

 

In this book, she argues that patriarchal projects of plantation, dam, and mining are related to violence and profit at the cost of degrading the natural environment, where local communities are facing problems of water and food scarcity forests are disappearing and wildlife is wiped out because of lots of construction, and they are losing their life support system. Shiva traces the myths of modern science, which began the scientific and industrial revolution and laid the foundations of a patriarchal mode of economic development in industrial capitalism. ‘The myth that the 'scientific revolution' was a universal process of intellectual progress is being steadily undermined by feminist scholarship and the histories of science of non-western cultures.’ (Shiva, 20)

 

Shiva mentions several ecologists in her work; one of the major ones is Chief Seattle’s letter, where he focused on the protection of wilderness and claimed nineteenth-century invasion and development and inspired other ecologists. ‘This we know - the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. All things are connected like the blood that unites one family. Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life; he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.' (Shiva, 18) 

 

It was not only a matter of India; the subjugation of women and nature began in the sixteenth century in Europe, the destruction of Africa, and the exploitation of the Amazonian rainforest, or we can say the lifeline of Brazil, by western development projects. Women of Uttarakhand stood in the front line to conserve the environment from exploitation and challenge Western projects of maldevelopment. It was the struggle of women, nature, and development. Shiva describes how Indian women struggled with ecological crises and protected nature as living Prakriti. She beautifully portrays the relationship between humans and nature as “Purusha and Prakriti.” According to Kalika Purana, prakriti is worshiped as Adi Shakti, a cosmic energy and creator of the world in combination with purusha, symbolic of the masculine principle.

 

Shiva traces 'scientific forestry' as a reductionist view of forestry that has emerged from the Western bias for profits, and the Chipko Movement deal by women of Uttarakhand, women who have expertise in forestry, responds against this paradigm to save trees of the Garhwal region. The Chipko Movement was a non-violent ecological campaign and pioneering practice, particularly by rural women along with local people in the Reni village of the Garhwal region of Uttarakhand in 1973, where they hugged trees and wrapped holy thread, and all females stayed up the whole night and challenged industrial society to protect forests from deforestation. The 10-year ban on commercial logging in the Alaknanda Valley was ultimately the consequence of the state government establishing a commission to investigate deforestation in the area as a result of the Reni case. Thinkers draw attention to the alliance of human nature and the natural environment and create links between scientific knowledge of man and the ecological knowledge of women, where women are experts in nature’s processes. ‘In the mountain regions of the Himalayas, the women of Garhwal ……to the Central Indian highlands. The women's contribution has been neglected and remains invisible, even though the history of Chipko is a history of the visions and actions of exceptionally courageous women.’ (Shiva, p.64)

 

The first documentation, used as the slogan of the Chipko Movement in 1973, marked this famous poem by Chipko poet Ghanshyam Raturi.

 

‘Embrace our trees

Save them from being felled.

The property of our hills

Save it from being looted.’

(Raturi, Ghanshyam, Chipko Song, 1970s) (Shiva, 69)

 

‘Who will save the environment?

If not us, then who?

If not now, then when?’

(Raturi, Ghanshyam, Chipko Song, 1970s)

 

She talks about the food crisis, which has destroyed nature's capital by masculinist agricultural science and development, and defines women who are experts and producers of food. The green revolution, scientific agriculture, and the white revolution come under the masculinist paradigm as a commodity, produced and exchanged for profit. The Green Revolution introduced chemicals to the soil, which threatened agriculture as well as the lives of humans and animals. Similarly, the white revolution reduced the production of milk, so she argues that the masculinist equation and feminist equation are different because the capitalist economy is controlled by men and the survival economy by women. 

 

                        Water is the lifeline for survival on earth, but now there are water crises in which plant, animal and human life struggle for survival. Water resources are overexploited, such as the diversion of natural water to engineered command, which reduced the flow of fresh water for profit maximization by the masculinist paradigm of water management. ‘As the women of Tehri state on the site where they have been protesting daily for nearly two decades, Tehri Dam is a symbol of destruction.’ (Tehri dam sampurnavinash ka pratikhai) (Shiva, p. 179)

 

Shiva advocates for women in the Third World who have confirmed that they have relevant expertise in survival. Today, new ecological awareness understands that the indigenous community has a special, sourceful insight into living in harmony with nature. She concludes that the Third World women have comprehensive knowledge of living and survival, yet their work is unacknowledged and unreported. They provide food to their families, cattle, and soil, and their struggle relates to economic and intellectual worth.

 

Conclusion

 

Ecofeminism is an ethical movement interconnected with women and ecological thought. Shiva analysed the historical and conceptual roots of Western patriarchy's development for profit, which caused environmental devastation and subjugation of women, and people were victims of hunger and famine. Chipko women and tribals had a deep knowledge of nature’s processes, but unfortunately, exploitation of nature and women by Western industrial culture is part of the destruction that has had a great impact not only in India but also on the globe. The technology and development paradigm is responsible for the current economic and ecological crises.  The consequence of excessive industrialization is human greed, which is leading to environmental damage for future generations. Both entities must be respected and protected in the world. Humans must fulfill their duties towards the environment and women and promote sustainable ecological practices.

Works Cited

 

d'Eaubonne, Françoise. Le féminismeou la mort. Le passagerclandestin, 2020.

Carson, Rachel. "Silent spring." Thinking about the Environment. Routledge, 2015. 150-155.

King, Ynestra. "The Ecology of Feminism and the Feminism of Ecology." Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. 19 (1989).

Guha, Ramachandra. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya. University of California Press, 2000.

Shiva, Vandana. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Survival in India. vol. 84. New Delhi: Kali for Women, 1988.

Furtwangler, Albert. Answering Chief Seattle. University of Washington Press, 1997.

Kalika Purana, 22-10-13, Bombay: Venkateshwara Press, 1927

Puleo, Alicia H. "What is ecofeminism." Quaderns de la Mediterrània 25 (2017): 27-34.

Shiva, Vandana, and Maria Mies. Ecofeminism. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.

Salleh, Ariel. Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx and the Postmodern. Zed Books Ltd., 2017.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/ecofeminism/Ecofeminisms-future

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335441481_General_Overview_of_Ecofeminism