☛ Colleges/Universities may contact us for publication of their conference/seminar papers at creativeflightjournal@gmail.com

Dalitism and Feminism: Locating Women in Indian Society

 


Dalitism and Feminism: Locating Women in Indian Society

Dr. Andrey Shastri,

Assistant Professor,

Department of History,

Amity University,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

 

Abstract: This paper portrays the meaning of Dalit, and feminism and from this lens where are Indian women stands in Indian society. Especially, the downtrodden section of every society, even in terms of female or male, this section is excluded from the different things. Different eminent scholars like Charu Gupta, Gopal Guru, Sharmila Rege confronts the heaviness of upper caste and patriarchal model on the lifestyle of lower caste. Different writings on Dalits and feminism always portray the different pragmatic points of discussion. This paper definitely, represents the concept of Dalitisim and feminism in context to Indian women. That where exactly after the 78 years of independence, we are standing. It actually, struggles a lot as a woman from the margins of society.

Keywords: Dalit, Feminism, Society, Caste, Gender

Introduction

Dalit feminism always aims to uphold their oppression by preventing narratives and by empowering Dalit women to express their stories. Dalit women always raise their voices for their rights and dignity. If we go back in historical time period, then we will find that prominent personality like Savitri Bai Phule, Jyotiba Phule, Ramabai Ambedkar, always leads a directions and plays an important and crucial role by emphasing the role of education and its importance by heading different types of anti caste and anti-untoucability campaigns in India. they always focussed on the cause of women's right, women's education, women's empowerment. Dalit feminisim is a powerful and important socio-political tool that finds an intersection between the caste, gender and class. It’s always been interests for Dalit women and to Dalit women. They also challenge different patriarchal stature that is going on in the society, still continuing in different forms. Discrimination against Dalit women has many dimensions. and these dimensions incorporated in the writings of these eminent scholars in different time phase. They raised complex issues faced by Dalit women based on their caste, gender and different socio- economic conditions. There is no doubt, that entire concept of Dalit feminism revolves around the assertion of agency and voice for Dalit women who have been marginalised historically.

Caste and Gender: A Dual Oppression

Dalit women face a "triple burden"—of caste, class, and gender. Unlike upper-caste women who may suffer primarily from patriarchy, Dalit women are victims of both Brahmanical patriarchy and caste-based exclusion. The work of scholars like Sharmila Rege and Gopal Guru emphasizes that caste cannot be treated as a backdrop to gender but as an active agent shaping women's experiences.

In India, caste and gender are not isolated categories but intersecting axes of oppression that shape the lives of Dalit women in profound and violent ways. While gender discrimination affects all women, Dalit women face a compounded form of marginalization that stems from both their caste identity and their womanhood. This dual oppression positions them at the lowest rung of India’s social hierarchy, often making their suffering invisible in both mainstream feminist and Dalit political narratives.

Caste-based violence against Dalit women is often a mechanism to assert caste supremacy. Dalit women are disproportionately subjected to sexual violence, social ostracization, forced labour, and denial of access to public spaces and resources. Crimes such as rape, public stripping, and parading naked are frequently used as tools of punishment for challenging caste hierarchies or asserting basic rights. Unlike upper-caste women, whose bodies are often protected within the frameworks of honour and purity, Dalit women’s bodies are treated as violable and expendable. This normalization of violence reveals how caste and gender operate together to enforce Brahmanical patriarchy.

Moreover, Dalit women experience exclusion from both the patriarchal power structures within their own communities and from upper-caste feminist movements. Within Dalit communities, women are often relegated to submissive roles, burdened by domestic responsibilities, and discouraged from engaging in political activism. Simultaneously, mainstream feminism in India has historically failed to account for caste, often promoting a universalist idea of womanhood that does not reflect the lived experiences of Dalit women. This erasure silences their voices and reinforces Savarna dominance in feminist discourse.

The idea of “Brahmanical patriarchy,” a term popularized by scholars like Uma Chakravarti, highlights how caste and gender are co-constructed systems. This patriarchal order maintains caste purity by controlling women’s sexuality and reproduction, especially through practices such as endogamy. Dalit women, who fall outside the caste-purity paradigm, are therefore denied the same protections and respect that upper-caste women receive, and are often hypersexualized and dehumanized in both social reality and popular imagination.

Labor is another site where caste and gender oppression intersect. Dalit women have historically been relegated to the most degrading and exploitative forms of labour, including manual scavenging and bonded labour. Unlike upper-caste women, who may be confined to domestic spaces, Dalit women are pushed into the public sphere as cheap and expendable laborers—yet without the protections or recognition of their contributions. This socio-economic exploitation reinforces their marginal status and perpetuates cycles of poverty and discrimination.

To truly understand the position of women in Indian society, it is essential to analyze caste and gender as mutually reinforcing systems. Dalit women do not experience patriarchy and caste discrimination separately; their experiences are shaped by the convergence of the two. Any feminist or social justice movement that fails to acknowledge this intersection runs the risk of reproducing the very hierarchies it seeks to dismantle. Hence, an intersectional framework—one that accounts for the interplay of caste, class, and gender—is critical for articulating a politics of liberation that is inclusive and transformative.

Dalits and Their Status

 

The word Dalit—literally means the “oppressed” or “broken” one. Sometime they are regarded as the untouchables also. They are found in every nook of India. They are the ones who lived within the Hindu traditional society, but had very limited freedom. The majorities of the Dalits are poor, socially backward, and usually deprived from all basic needs. They had no rights on anything. They are also deprived from educational opportunities. Although some of the Dalits had very good jobs and good educational background but still more people are lagging behind in every aspect. Every day in most of the sector they face multiple discriminations in various forms. Earlier, they named as "Untouchables" by the Caste Hindus. Later on, they were recognized as 'Depressed classes' and 'scheduled castes'. These phrases came out by the Government Act of 1935. Mohandas K. Gandhi coined the word 'Harijan', which means "the children of God." But this term was not welcomed by the Dalits because it did not adequately describe their condition. They are not treated even as human beings leave alone being respected as people of God. They are not treated equally in this society.

 

India’s caste system assigns individuals a certain hierarchical status according to Hindu beliefs. Apart from the four castes in India, the Dalits people fall into the category of schedule caste. Being the members of the lowest rank of Indian society, Dalits face different kinds of discrimination at almost every level: from access to education and medical facilities to restrictions on where they can live and what jobs they can have. The discrimination against the Dalits is especially significant because of the number of people affected just because they belonged to lower caste. India is home to over 200 million Dalits. According to Paul Diwakar, a Dalit activist from the National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights, "India has 600,000 villages and almost every village a small pocket on the outskirts is meant for Dalits." Dalits form around 16.6% of India's population. The 2011 census recorded nearly 20.14 crore people belonging to various scheduled castes in the country. As per the 2001 census, the number was 16.66 crore.

 

Within the Dalit community, there are many divisions into sub-castes. Dalits are divided into leather workers, street sweepers, cobblers, agricultural workers, and manual “scavengers”, these are the different sub-divisions of this caste. Approximately three-quarters of the Dalit workforce are in the agricultural sector of the economy. A majority of the country’s forty million people who are bonded labourers are Dalits.  These kinds of job   rarely provide them income to feed their families or to send their children to school as a result of which many Dalits are impoverished, uneducated, and illiterate and backward.

 

Since from the very early times, Dalits have been oppressed, culturally subjugated, and politically marginalized. Even sometime the Dalits are not allowed to sit in front or along with the high caste people, they are also not allowed to eat with, and not even allowed to marry. Discrimination for Dalits does not end if they convert from Hinduism to any other religion. Upper castes maintain dominant leadership quality while Dalit members of these religions are often marginalized and flagrantly discriminated against.  The lower caste people told that their place in the caste hierarchy is due to their sins in a past life.  Vivid punishments of torture and death are assigned for crimes such as gaining literacy or insulting a member of a dominant caste. Because of this ideology they never think to bring changes in themselves or in others mind.

Dalit Feminist Standpoint

Dalit feminism is not merely a variant of Indian feminism—it is a radical political critique of both caste and patriarchy. Dalit literature, oral testimonies, and grassroots activism reveal how Dalit women resist, negotiate, and survive systems of oppression. The articulation of "Dalit womanhood" as a distinct identity is itself a powerful political act. The Dalit feminist standpoint emerges as a distinct and necessary intervention within Indian feminist discourse. Rooted in the lived experiences of Dalit women, it challenges both the Brahmanical patriarchy embedded in Indian society and the Savarna-centric framework of mainstream feminism. Dalit feminism is not simply an extension of feminist or Dalit movements—it is an autonomous ideological and political standpoint that critiques the exclusions and silences produced by both.

The fundamental assertion of Dalit feminism is that caste and gender are inseparable in the lives of Dalit women. While mainstream feminism in India has historically been dominated by upper-caste women, its theoretical frameworks often universalize women's experiences without addressing the unique oppressions faced by Dalit women. Similarly, Dalit political movements have prioritized caste issues through a largely patriarchal lens, sidelining the gendered experiences of Dalit women. In contrast, Dalit feminism emphasizes an intersectional analysis, where caste, class, and gender operate simultaneously to shape structural inequalities.

Dalit feminist scholars such as Sharmila Rege, Gopal Guru, and Ruth Manorama have argued that Dalit women's standpoint is a site of both knowledge and resistance. This standpoint arises not from academic abstraction but from centuries of systemic exploitation, exclusion, and struggle. It is grounded in what Rege termed “the epistemological break”—a disruption of dominant narratives by centering subaltern voices. Dalit women's experiences with sexual violence, caste-based labour, landlessness, and denial of education produce a consciousness that is both political and transformative.

One of the central themes of Dalit feminism is the critique of Brahmanical patriarchy—a system in which caste and gender hierarchies reinforce each other. In this system, upper-caste women's sexuality is regulated to maintain caste purity, while Dalit women's sexuality is left unprotected and violated as a method of caste-based control. Dalit feminists expose how this dual marginalization not only subjects them to violence but also erases their agency in societal and feminist narratives.

Dalit women’s voices have found powerful expression through literature, autobiographies, and oral histories. Writers like Baby Kamble, Bama, and Urmila Pawar offer counter-narratives to dominant histories by documenting the brutal realities and resilient spirits of Dalit women. These narratives do not just depict suffering; they highlight resistance, survival, and political consciousness. Through such testimonies, the Dalit feminist standpoint asserts itself as a legitimate site of knowledge production and social critique.

Furthermore, Dalit feminism is deeply rooted in collective activism. Organizations such as the National Federation of Dalit Women (NFDW) have worked to foreground issues such as caste-based sexual violence, land rights, and political representation. Dalit feminist activism demands not only legal reforms but also a cultural shift in how society views caste and gender relations.

Challenges and Concern

Dalit women in India face layered challenges that stem from the intersection of caste and gender. They are often excluded from mainstream feminist spaces, where upper-caste narratives dominate, and their issues are either ignored or tokenized. Caste-based sexual violence against Dalit women is met with institutional apathy, and their underrepresentation in leadership roles further silences their voices. Additionally, cultural stereotyping, internal patriarchy within Dalit communities, and lack of access to quality education and employment continue to marginalize them, making their struggle for dignity and justice an uphill battle.

Marginalization within Feminist Movements

Dalit women’s voices are often excluded from mainstream feminist discourse, which is dominated by upper-caste narratives that fail to address caste-based issues.

Lack of Intersectionality in Policy and Practice

Government policies and feminist programs rarely adopt an intersectional lens that considers the combined impact of caste, gender, and class on Dalit women’s lives.

Underrepresentation in Leadership and Academia

Dalit women are vastly underrepresented in academic, political, and organizational leadership, leading to limited visibility of their issues in public policy and intellectual spaces.

Caste-Based Sexual Violence and Institutional Apathy

Dalit women face brutal sexual violence, often with the tacit complicity or indifference of law enforcement and judiciary systems, reinforcing a culture of impunity.

Literacy rate

The literacy rate among Dalit women in India remains significantly lower than the national average, reflecting systemic barriers to education. According to the 2011 Census, the literacy rate for Dalit women was around 56.5%, compared to 73% for the general female population. Factors such as poverty, early marriage, caste-based discrimination in schools, and lack of educational infrastructure in marginalized communities contribute to this disparity. Low literacy levels restrict Dalit women’s access to employment, awareness of rights, and participation in political and social spheres, perpetuating cycles of marginalization.

Barriers to Education and Employment

Systemic discrimination continues to limit Dalit women's access to quality education and fair employment opportunities, hindering socio-economic mobility. Dalit women face multiple barriers to accessing quality education, rooted in caste-based discrimination, poverty, and gender bias. In many rural areas, schools remain socially segregated, and Dalit girls often face humiliation, exclusion, and even violence from teachers and peers. Economic hardship forces many into child labour or early marriage, cutting short their educational journeys. Additionally, lack of safe transportation, absence of toilets in schools, and limited role models further discourage their continued schooling, reinforcing structural inequality from an early age.

Internal Patriarchy within Dalit Communities

Dalit movements often replicate patriarchal norms, making it difficult for Dalit women to find support even within their own communities.

Absence of Safe and Inclusive Spaces

Apart from these there is a lack of safe spaces—academic, activist, or community-based—where Dalit women can articulate their concerns without fear or censorship.

 

Some Recommendations for Social and Gender Equity

Addressing the multifaceted oppression faced by Dalit women in India requires transformative, inclusive, and sustained interventions at multiple levels—policy, community, education, and activism. The following suggestions aim to promote social justice and ensure the inclusion of Dalit women's voices in India's feminist and developmental discourse.

1. Promote Intersectional Feminism in Policy and Practice:

There is a need to integrate an intersectional lens into all feminist and governmental frameworks. Policies and schemes for women’s welfare should explicitly acknowledge and address caste-based disparities. Government bodies, NGOs, and academic institutions must prioritize Dalit women’s issues as distinct from generalized women's empowerment agendas.

2. Ensure Equal Educational Access and Representation:

Educational equity must be a central concern. Efforts should be made to ensure access to quality education for Dalit girls and women, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. This includes improving school infrastructure, sensitizing educators to caste and gender issues, offering scholarships and mentorship programs, and ensuring safe learning environments. Representation of Dalit women as educators and curriculum reform that includes Dalit voices and histories can also foster dignity and inclusion.

3. Strengthen Legal Protection and Justice Mechanisms:

Fast-track courts and stronger implementation of laws such as the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act are essential to address caste-based sexual violence. Legal aid services must be made more accessible for Dalit women, and law enforcement personnel should undergo sensitivity training to reduce systemic bias and victim-blaming.

4. Amplify Dalit Women’s Voices in Leadership and Media:

Greater efforts should be made to include Dalit women in leadership roles across political, academic, and civil society spaces. Media should feature more narratives authored by Dalit women themselves, rather than speaking for them. This will help break stereotypes and give space to authentic, lived experiences.

5. Foster Solidarity between Dalit and Savarna Feminists:

Dialogue and alliance-building between Dalit and upper-caste feminists are crucial. Upper-caste feminists must reflect on their caste privilege and open space for Dalit women to lead conversations. Solidarity should be based on equity, shared learning, and mutual respect, not appropriation or tokenism.

6. Encourage Community-Level Sensitization and Mobilization:

Grassroots activism and awareness campaigns should focus on dismantling casteist attitudes within communities. This includes sensitizing men within Dalit and non-Dalit communities to the intersecting struggles of caste and gender and fostering collective responsibility for change.

Conclusion

There is a very meagre development in context to Dalits as compared to non Dalits. The backwardness of Dalits is mostly because of the injustice done to them, from higher caste people. Since centuries they have been worked as slaves, and still there is no improvement in their condition which has resulted social discrimination, economic deprivation, and educational backwardness. They had to fight for their own rights. The devastating effects of caste system had created a lot discrimination among the society members, which hampers the development of a nation. Dalits women are too discriminated on being women and next on being Dalit women. They are twice exploited and torture by this society. They are exploited on the grounds of poverty, economic status, lack of education and lack of awareness. Despites of several government efforts the Dalits girls drop - out soon from the schools, as they do not have the proper environment at home. Thus, the funds which are allocated by the government for their welfare are hardly able to bring any distinct change in their life. They remain helpless, ignorant, exploited. They are victims of worst kind of patriarchy, casteism and corruption in Indian society. This situation makes their life difficult and full of miseries. The issue of Dalit and Dalit women is of a crucial importance in the contemporary Indian society.  Today's need is “to Awake and Arise” of our own rights.

 

Locating Dalit women within the frameworks of feminism and caste justice reveals the urgent need for an inclusive and intersectional approach. Their lived experiences challenge both patriarchal and casteist structures, demanding a redefinition of empowerment that includes voice, dignity, and representation. True social transformation can only occur when the most marginalized are heard and centered in the struggle. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar powerfully stated, “I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress which women have achieved.” The liberation of Dalit women is not just a feminist cause—it is a measure of our collective humanity.

 

 

Works Cited

 

Sabharwal N.S. and Sonalkar W. Dalit Women in India: At The Crossroad of Gender, Class, and Caste, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 2015.

Ghatak Progya, Societal Status of Dalit Women in India, ResearchGate, 2011.

Mahey Sonia, The Status of Dalit Women in India's Caste Based system.

Rege, Sharmila.Writing Caste/Writing Gender: Narrating Dalit Women's Testimonios. Zubaan, 2006.

Guru, Gopal. “Dalit Women Talk Differently.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 30, no. 41–42, 1995, pp. 2548–2550.