Ecological Consciousness in Tagore’s Pedagogy, Poetry and Philosophy
Md. Imam Hossain,
Independent Researcher,
Department of Philosophy,
University of Dhaka,
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Abstract: Rabindranath Tagore (1861–1941) was a
legendary Bengali poet, philosopher and educator who learned mostly from his
own experiences rather than through formal education. From his childhood in
rural Bengal, he developed a deep affinity with nature which is reflected
throughout his literary works. This paper explores the ecological consciousness
manifested in Tagore’s educational experiments, poetic imagination and
philosophical reflections. His work demonstrates a sustained effort to harmony
between humans and the natural world at a time when colonial modernity promoted
alienation from ecological life. This article examines how Tagore’s pedagogical
experiments at Santiniketan, his poetic representations of nature and his
philosophical essays collectively articulate an eco-centric worldview. The
study focuses on three types of being or sattva: Prakatisatta (the being of
nature), Manabsatta (human consciousness) and Paramsatta (supreme
consciousness) to show how these concepts promote a holistic vision of
ecological ethics. The study concludes that Tagore’s eco‑centric consciousness
remains a compelling model for ecological humanism today.
Keywords:
Eco-centrism, Being of Nature, Pedagogy, Rabindranath Tagore, Santiniketan
Introduction
Rabindranath Tagore (1861–1941) was a famous poet,
philosopher, educator and thinker who have a great influence on literature, art
and education in South Asia, especially in Bengal. He was born into a
culturally rich and intellectual family of Bengal. Tagore did not receive any
formal education in a college or university. Instead, he was a man of learning
through his own observation and experiences. Tagore’s bond with the nature
influenced his perception about life and the universe. In his autobiography Jeebansmriti, he recalls his childhood
memory with the green surroundings.
His affinity with nature became a philosophical basis for
his educational and ecological vision. Tagore established Santiniketan, which
later developed into Visva-Bharati
University. In Santiniketan students could learn in harmony with the natural
environment. He believed that education should not be confined to enclosed
classrooms and books. Students should learn from direct engagement with the
seasons, the sky, the rivers and the forests. For Tagore, nature is a best
teacher to nurtured moral awareness, aesthetic appreciation and ecological
sensitivity of a person.
Throughout his life, Tagore had a close relationship with
nature. He spent long periods in seclusion in rural Bengal and observed the
life of birds, fish and trees. These experiences nurtured his eco-poetic
sensibility for his thought and writings. His writings repeatedly show that
nature has an active role in human growth, moral development and spiritual
realization. His educational experiments at Santiniketan, the lyrical
landscapes of his poetry and the philosophical essays encourage individuals to
discover their intimate relationship with the natural world. At Santiniketan,
this thought took concrete form.Students are encouraged to learn through
observation, interaction and creativity in open-airplaces. Here, education is
not confined to books or memorization but education is engaged to the rhythms
of life, seasons and the ethical lessons of the environment.
Tagore’s critique of modern civilization shows his
ecological concerns are not limited to pedagogy or literature. His ecological
concern extended to cultural issues. He observed that industrial progress and
unrestrained materialism isolates individuals from ecological life and force to
disrupt natural balance. In his view, human freedom is not the power to
dominate or exploit the earth, but the capacity to live wisely and harmoniously
within its limits. He wrote about unity of life, the moral and spiritual
dignity of nature which emphasized on intrinsic value of all natural beings.
This idea is correspond to what later ecological philosophers defined as “deep ecology.” According to the first
key principle of the Deep Ecology Platform, “nonhuman life have inherent value independent of their utility to
humans” (Næss 76).
This ecological consciousness further can be observed in
his critique of western attitude toward nature. Tagore observes that in the
West, nature is often regarded as separate from human existence and treated as
either inanimate or valuable only for its utility with a clear demarcation
between humans and the natural world. He criticizes this reason-based approach
that measures value in terms of hierarchical perfection or intellectual and
moral “stamps” applied to beings rather than recognize their inherent worth. As
he said,
In the West the prevalent feeling is that Nature belongs
exclusively to inanimate things and to beasts, that there is sudden
unaccountable break where human-nature begins…But the Indian mind never has any
hesitation in acknowledging its kinship with nature, its unbroken relation with
all (Tagore, Sadhana 6–7).
Through this observation, Tagore emphasizes that the
Indian philosophical and cultural tradition naturally acknowledges ecological
interdependence, kinship and ethical responsibility toward all life. This
kinship between humans and nature is also present in Tagore’s educational and
literary work which forms the basis for his eco-pedagogy.
This article aims to explore how Tagore’s pedagogical
practice, literary works and philosophical essays collectively articulate an
ecological consciousness that remains profoundly relevant to contemporary
environmental discourses.
Nature as
Classroom: Eco‑Pedagogy at Santiniketan
Pedagogical experiment at Santiniketan (later Visva-Bharati) is a concrete effort of
Tagore’s ecological thinking. His effort rests on the belief that nature is the
best teacher. His school at Santiniketan intentionally designed as an “asrama” under the open sky, where
students learned not only from books but from the rhythmic change of seasons,
the shade of trees and the quiet presence of birds and wind. There is no
pressure to follow a mechanical routine.
Tagore rejected the rigid colonial education model that
confined students to enclosed classrooms. He argued that such confinement
produced mechanical learners detached from life. Tagore’s dislike of
conventional classrooms came from his personal experience. In Personality, he describes the moment
when he was removed from the freedom of nature and placed inside a conventional
school: “all of a sudden I found my world
vanishing from around me, giving place to wooden benches and straight walls
staring at me with the blank stare of the blind”(Personality 390). For
Tagore, such confinement dulled curiosity and separated students from the
living world that nurtures imagination and ethical sensitivity. The classroom,
as he experienced it, was a place of restriction, not growth. From this
dissatisfaction emerged his lifelong effort to build a school where learning
could occur in “the atmosphere of living
aspiration” rather than the “maimed
life of monastic seclusion” (Personality 395).Therefore, Tagore’s pedagogy
emphasized ecological sensitivity, ethical awareness and an appreciation of natural
beauty as essential components of holistic development.
Tagore criticizes conventional schooling as the “education factory.”His criticism clearly
shows why he later developed a different kind of school at Santiniketan.
According to him, in traditional schooling systems, classroom is lifeless space
where lessons fall on children “like
hailstones on flowers.” This mechanical education harms a child’s natural
curiosity. He believed that children should learn in a living environment where
a children will be surprised by life and the world around him. In one of his
reflections on education, he gives a powerful description of how mechanical
schooling harms the child’s inner growth. He writes:
…the child's
life is brought into the education factory, lifeless, colorless, dissociated
from the context of the universe, with bare white walls staring like eyeballs
of the dead. The children have to sit inert whilst lessons are pelted at them
like hailstones on flowers. I believe that children should be surrounded with
the things of nature that have their own educational value. Their minds should
be allowed to stumble on and be surprised at everything that happens before
them in the life of today. The new tomorrow will stimulate their attention with
new facts of life (Tagore, Selected essays 333-334)
His idea that children should be “surrounded with the things of nature” directly leads to his belief
that education must take place in open spaces and in close contact with the
natural environment. This understanding becomes the basis of his
nature-centered educational model at Santiniketan. Later it becomes his
educational mission of Visva-Bharati.
Tagore anticipated concerns about environmental
alienation and argued that a sustainable future depends on nurture of empathy
toward the natural world from early childhood. His belief that education should
bring humans “in harmony with all
existence” is fully reflected in his open-air, nature-centered pedagogy of
Santiniketan. Because in Santiniketan student is allowed to expand freedom and
harmony with its surroundings. For Tagore, “the
highest education is that which does not merely give us information but makes
our life in harmony with all existence” (Tagore, Personality 390). He
sought an education that developed moral sensitivity, aesthetic appreciation
and ecological empathy by direct contact with nature. Through practices such as
outdoor classes, seasonal festivals, nature-inspired art and tree-planting
rituals (Vriksha‑Ropana Utsav),
Tagore built a pedagogy grounded in ecological consciousness. This eco-centric
pedagogy cultivated ecological responsibility and humility within Students that
encourages to see themselves as part of nature rather than masters of nature.
Eco‑poetic
Sensibilities in Tagore’s Literature
Rabindranath Tagore’s literary works provide one of the
finest expressions of ecological consciousness in modern South Asian
literature. His writings often described as “Eco-poetic,” because they consistently portray nature as animate,
sacred and intimately connected to human life. In his poetry and songs,
especially in collections such as Prakriti-Parjaya,
natural elements, rivers, forests, birds, rainfall, sunrise and seasonal
changes are treated as companions that interact with the human spirit. Tagore’s
early years own experience with nature in Shelidah informed these ecological
sensibilities. His deep intimacy with rivers, sky and rural landscapes nurtured
the ecological consciousness. In his Nobel
Prize acceptance speech, he recalls living in solitude in a boat house on
the Ganges, where wild ducks were his only companions during autumn:“…the murmur of the river used to speak to me
and tell me the secrets of nature” ( Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech 961).
During his years in Shelidah, travelling through waterways on the houseboat Padma, Tagore entered one of the most
creative phases of his life by produce poems, plays, songs and essays that were
deeply inspired by nature.
Tagore’s eco-poetic sensibility becomes especially vivid
in the essay “Aranya Debata” (God of
Forest), where he expresses concern about the deteriorating relationship
between humans and nature. He writes that wilderness everywhere is becoming
difficult to protect from “the
all-encompassing greed of man.”He warns that God has given life and a
habitable environment, but it is man who out of greed has contributed to his
own destruction. He argues that by destroying the wilderness, people bring ruin
upon themselves. He mourns the destruction of trees, “those who refresh the air and whose fallen leaves give fertility to the
land.”For him, this ecological violence is ultimately self-destructive
(qtd. in Zafor 12).
The same ecological anguish appears in his poem “Sabyatār Prati” (To Civilization) from Chaitali, where he protests against
modern urbanization that disregards environmental well-being. His urges to
modern civilization to reduce ecological destruction was evident in his poems:
“Dao phire se
Aranya (Give me back the forest),
Lao e nagar (And
take this city away),
Lao joto louh
loshtra kashto o prostor (Take your steel, bricks and stone walls),
Heh nabosabhyota!
(O new-fangled civilization!) ”
(Tagore, Chaitali
36)
Such experience with nature inspired his artistic
imagination and understanding of spiritual liberation.
In his poems like The
Stream of Life and other nature themed pieces, natural elements become
metaphors for interconnectedness, transience and cosmic unity. In Tagore’s
poem:
The same stream of life that runs through my
veins night and day runs through the world and dances in rhythmic measures.
It is the same life that shoots in joy
through the dust of the earth in numberless blades of grass and breaks into
tumultuous waves of leaves and flowers.
It is the same life that is rocked in the
ocean-cradle of birth and of death, in ebb and in flow.
I feel my limbs are made glorious by the
touch of this world of life. And my pride is from the life-throb of ages
dancing in my blood this moment.
(Gitanjali 64-65)
It shows that Tagore viewed a single living stream flows
through all beings: the grass, the flowers and the human. It symbolizes
universal life essence that binds all existence together.
Tagore advocates compassion for nature. His compassion
for nature is evident in his dramatic and narrative works such as plays and
short stories. In his short story named Balai,
this love is shown through the young protagonist Balai, who feels a deep connection with trees and cannot bear to
see them harmed. This sensitivity becomes clear in the following lines:
He (Balai)
cannot like that anybody pluck flowers. And he also has understood that this
feeling of his has no meaning to others. So he wants to hide this within
himself. Throwing stones the boys of his age pluck amloki, but he cannot say
anything to them, he simply turns away from the spot. Also to provoke him, boys
of his age, while going along the garden path, beat the plants with sticks or
suddenly pluck a tender bough of Bakul tree. He feels like crying but he
cannot, lest other boys should call him mad (qtd. in Zafor 11).
Raktakarabi (Red oleanders) is a famous symbolic play of Tagore. It
can be read as a powerful critique of exploitative industrial modernity. The
play presents Yaksha as a dark Town,
where the landscape is dominated by mines, machinery and an authoritarian
system that treats the natural environment merely as a resource to be
extracted. In this mechanical world,
Tagore shows how the alienation from nature leads directly to the alienation of
the human spirit. Tagore symbolically presents this mechanized world as spiritually
barren which is cut off from sunlight, greenery and the rhythms of organic
life. Protagonist Nandini emerges as
the symbol of nature’s purity against this oppressive system. Her presence
exposes humans attempt to control nature through greed and technological
domination. The miners’ suffering
shows that how violence against the environment inevitably leads to violence
against people:
Earth gives away her treasures happily
through Nature. But when man in his pride and arrogance exploits Nature by doing
violence to her a curse falls on him (Red
Oleanders, 48).
Through this powerful declaration, Nandini reveals that nature’s generosity is conditional on respect,
not on domination. When humans harm nature through excessive extraction and
technological pride, the consequences rebound upon themselves. Thus, Raktakarabi becomes an ecological
allegory in which Tagore insists that true progress lies not in mechanized
exploitation but in restore balance, compassion and mutual coexistence between
humans and the earth.
Ontology of Nature
in Tagore’s thought
Beyond pedagogy and poetry, Tagore’s philosophical essays
articulate an ecological ontology. In modern literature, his ecological
ontology is sometimes termed as “symbiotic ecologism” (Biswas 11). For Tagore, Nature
is an expression of the universal self. The human spirit is not separate from
the natural world, rather participates in the same cosmic reality. When humans
perceive themselves as isolated or superior, ecological disharmony ensues.
From his childhood Tagore had a deep bond with nature. In
his writings, especially in autobiography Jeebansmriti,
we find abundant evidence of Tagore’s lifelong relation with nature. Simple
acts such as observing ducks swimming in the water or walking among coconut
trees lined along the boundaries of his home, gave him pleasure and an intimate
experience. His thought about the human–nature relationship can be discussed
into three categories: Prakatisatta
(being of nature), Manabsatta (human
being), and Paramsatta (Supreme
Being) (Mondal 2).
Prakatisatta (the being of nature)is the starting point of Tagore’s
ecological thought. For Tagore, nature is not an inanimate or passive entity.
It is an active and self-expressive reality. Trees, rivers, mountains and the wind
are all manifestations of Prakatisatta. They are connected with human beings in
subtle ways. In Jeebansmriti, Tagore
recalls how he spent long hours by observing the movements of the sun, the flow
of rivers and the changing seasons. Tagore’s relation with nature went beyond
the superficial beauty of landscapes.He perceived a concealed reality innatural
thing. He describes how the first rays of the sun revealed to him a sudden
awareness of the universe’s hidden glory:
“A momentary curtain lifted from my eyes, and
I saw the cosmos resplendent in beauty and joy…all sorrow in my heart was
instantly dissolved, and light suffused my being”(Jeebansmriti 120-121).
The morning sky,
the motion of clouds, or the shimmering of rivers are all manifestations of Prakatisatta
which inspire both aesthetic delight and ethical reflection.
Manabsatta, or human being represents the individual self and its
capacities for thought, emotion and action. For Tagore, every human being
carries within them an inner consciousness of other beings that allows empathy
and social responsibility. He believed that humans are not isolated entities.
Humans are existing in continual relationship with other beings and the
environment. This relational understanding of Tagore’s ecological thought
bridges the self and the natural world.
The innermost consciousness resides within every
individual that promotes love, care and sympathy for others. Tagore named this
consciousness as Paramsatta (Supreme
Being).Human fulfillment comes from
realizing this inner divine presence. Awareness of Paramsatta encourages humans to act responsibly toward nature and
all other beings. This supreme consciousness enables ethical action and
spiritual growth in individuals. The recognition of Paramsatta is essential for
the development of what Tagore called ‘Jeebandevta
Tatta’ (the divine of life). As Tagore said:
“The poet, who
takes all favorable and adverse elements of my life and composes my existence,
I have named him the Jeebandevta in my poetry” (Atmaparichay 7).
There is a reciprocal relation between humans and the
Jeebandevta. Humans act with sincerity and devotion, while the divine responds
with love and guidance. This intimate and relational understanding of the
divine is similar to the Baul spiritual practice. In Baul philosophy, the
Supreme Being is realized within the human heart. Bauls refer to this inner
presence as the “Maner Manush.”The Jeebandevta concept is also correspond
to the Vedic and Upanishadic notion of Sarveshvara,
the all-pervading divine. The relational and affectionate aspects of Jeebandevta can be found in Vaishnava devotion. On one side, Paramsatta operates as a universal and
impersonal principle which governs the natural laws. On the other side, it
manifests as a personal and loving presence which engages with individual
beings ((Mondal 4).
Thus, Tagore’s ontological ecologism provides a holistic
outlook for understanding human-nature relationships. While Prakatisatta focuses on the intrinsic
value of the nature, Paramsatta leads humans to an ethical and compassionate
action. They manifest with together in Jeebandevta. This outlook became a
conceptual basis for his ecological consciousness.
Concluding remarks
While western environmentalism or conservationism treat
nature as resource and limited to scientific management, Tagore’s “eco‑ethic” emphasizes on care and
spiritual harmony. Tagore’s pedagogy teaches that ecological awareness must
begin early, his poetry reminds us that nature is a living entity and his
philosophy provides a moral basis for environmental responsibility. Such a
holistic attitude is relevant in contemporary times. Since Contemporary
environmental approaches mostly rooted in secular, scientific and
techno-centric paradigms. These approaches often fail to recognize the cultural
foundations of ecological sustainability. Tagore’s ecological concern provides
an alternative vision which is rooted in eco-poetic sensibility, cultural
values and education.
Furthermore,
Tagore’s approach encourages community-based environmental practices such as
local stewardship, participatory conservation. It also encourages us to
cultivate virtues like gratitude, humility and empathy that promotes long-term
environmental sustainability. In this sense, Tagore’s ecological vision does
not simply address environmental problems. Rather, it transforms the human
mindset that produces those problems.
Works Cited
Biswas, A. “Eco-Ethical Philosophy: Understanding Rabindranath Tagore’s
Alternative Approach and Care Paradigm in His Symbiotic Ecologism.” Indialogs, vol. 12, no. 2, 2025, pp.
11–42.
Mondal, Sujit Kumar. “Rabindra Bhavanay Prakritisatta O Paramasatta.” Pratidhwani the Echo: A Peer-Reviewed International Journal of Humanities & Social Science, vol. 4, no. 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 1–6.
Næss, Arne. “Intrinsic Value: Will the Defenders of Nature Please Rise?” Wisdom in the Open Air: The Nature of Philosophy, edited by Peter Reed and David Rothenberg, University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
Tagore, Rabindranath. Atmaparichay. Visva-Bharati, 1949.
---. Chaitali. Visva-Bharati, Sept. 1927.
---. Gitanjali (Song Offerings). Translated by the author, introduction by W. B. Yeats, Macmillan, 1915.
---. Jeebansmriti. Visva-Bharati, 1913. 3rd ed., 1960.
---. Red Oleanders. Macmillan Paperback Edition, 2000.
---. Sadhana: The Realisation of Life. Macmillan and Co., Limited, 1930.
---. Selected Essays. Rupa & Co., 2004.
---. “Personality.” The English Writings of Rabindranath Tagore, vol. 2, edited by Sisir K. Das, Sahitya Akademi, 1996.
---. “The Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech.” The English Writings of Rabindranath Tagore, vol. 3, edited by Sisir K. Das, Sahitya Akademi, 1996.
Zafor, Md. Abu. “Ecocritical Reading of Tagore, Das, Wordsworth and Frost: A Comparative Analysis.” Jagannath University Journal of Arts, vol. 6, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1–16.