☛ We are inviting submission for Regular Issue (Vol. 7, No. 2, April 2026). The Last Date of Submission is 31 March, 2026.
☛ Colleges/Universities may contact us for publication of their conference/seminar papers at creativeflightjournal@gmail.com

From Folktale to Eco-tale: Rethinking Vijaydan Detha’s Baatan Ri Fulwari in the Light of Environmental Humanities

 


From Folktale to Eco-tale: Rethinking Vijaydan Detha’s Baatan Ri Fulwari in the Light of Environmental Humanities

 

Shankar Lal Seemawat,

Assistant Professor,

Department of English,

Motilal Nehru College,

New Delhi, India.

 

Abstract: This paper explores Vijaydan Detha’s Baatan Ri Fulwari (Garden of Tales) comprising Rajasthani oral folktales sourced from rural Borunda (Jodhpur), through the lens of environmental humanities, in the interdisciplinary approach reinterpreting it as an eco-tale. Rereading these stories through the lens of environmental humanities uncovers ecological sensibilities, human-animal interrelations, reverence for nonhuman beings, adaptations within arid landscapes, and symbolic exchanges between humans and nature. All these relationships foreground sustainability, resilience and environmental ethics. It argues that Detha’s storytelling implicitly advocates for ecological balance, respect for biodiversity and ethical coexistence with the more-than-human world before the rise of modern environmentalism. Drawing on theorists such as Cheryll Glotfelty (advocating a shift from anthropocentrism to eco-consciousness leading towards an earth-centered orientation) and Lawrence Buell (suggesting the legitimacy of non-human environment as co-participant paving a processual sense of environment), the paper will analyze how Detha’s tales critique anthropocentrism, highlight human-nature interdependence and reimagine folktales as eco-tales. 

 

Keywords: Environment; eco-criticism; oral folktales; desert ecology; indigenous knowledge

 

Introduction

 

We have witnessed that the emerging field of environmental humanities demands interdisciplinary inquiry into human-nature relations, especially in the context of escalating ecological crises. Revisiting traditional narratives (often oral folktales), reveals latent ecological wisdom and indigenous environmental ethics. These ethics would be often overlooked in mainstream discourse. Vijaydan Detha’s Baatan Ri Fulwari (Garden of Tales), a seminal collection of Rajasthani folktales rooted in the arid Borunda region of Jodhpur, stands at this intersection of cultural preservation and ecological consciousness. While traditionally we value it for its rich portrayal of Rajasthani identity, morality, social justice and gender, yet we also find that it embodies a profound, though underexplored, environmental dimension in essence.

Detha’s tales transcend not only cultural documentation but actively challenge anthropocentric and dualistic frameworks also that separate humans from nature. By foregrounding elements like trees, animals, rivers and seasons as sentient and dynamic participants in the narratives, these stories articulate a worldview where nature is interwoven with human existence - inviting a rethinking of dominant exploitative paradigms of modernity. This ecological (environmental) lens reveals Baatan Ri Fulwarias a site of resistance and alternative epistemologies, aligned with indigenous cosmologies emphasizing reciprocity, sustainability and coexistence.

The central metaphor of the garden (fulwari) in these tales embodies both physical and symbolic significance - representing fertility, care and resilience amid Rajasthan’s fragile water-scarce ecosystem. The gardener’s persistent nurturing amidst environmental and social adversities mirrors human hope and stewardship in the metaphorical sense. Through detailed descriptions of flora, climatic challenges and community interdependence, the garden emerges as a liminal space where human agency and natural forces interact dialectically towards the rekindling of ecological awareness and preservation.

When we re-examine Baatan Ri Fulwarithrough eco-critical frameworks, we underscore its potential as an ecological pedagogy that critiques industrial modernity and colonial exploitation. Thus, I argue that Detha’s folktales function not only as cultural artefacts but as eco-tale narratives that rethink human-nature relations and advocate for sustainable, holistic coexistence by making them profoundly relevant in contemporary environmental humanities discourse.

Theoretical Framework: Folktales, Eco-criticism and Environmental Humanities

 

Environmental humanities, as an interdisciplinary field, challenges “entrenched anthropocentric paradigms” by emphasizing relationality between humans and nonhuman entities (Glotfelty, 1996, p.92). Eco-criticism, a pivotal strand within this domain, “investigates literature as a terrain where environmental ethics and awareness are negotiated” (Buell, 1995, p.163). Folktales, once marginalized within Western literary canons, have recently gained recognition as “carriers of indigenous ecological knowledge, embedding ethical frameworks grounded in local biodiversity and sustainable practices” (Berkes, 2012, p.145). We are familiar that they are important cultural treasures that connect people to their heritage and provide insight into human nature and society inculcating the spirits of culture, values and beliefs.

Indigenous narratives like folktales encode deep environmental understanding through metaphor and allegory by fostering respect for interspecies interdependence and land stewardship. In the Rajasthani context, oral traditions have long served as “repositories of community knowledge on resource management, seasonal cycles and ethical norms toward nature” (Dube, 2010). While Baatan Ri Fulwarihas been traditionally examined for cultural and linguistic significance (Detha, 1991; Wagle, 2014, p. 132), applying an eco-critical lens reveals its rich ecological substratum.

Glotfelty’s foundational definition of ecocriticism underscores the study of literature’s relationship with the physical environment. He insists on analysis of texts within environmental, socialand historical contexts to uncover constructions of human-nature interaction. Buell’s framework stresses that environmental literature must portray nature as more than mere backdrop. He incorporates nonhuman perspectives and reflect ethical accountability to the environment.

Plumwood’s critique further enriches this perspective by emphasizing indigenous knowledge systems that perceive trees, animals and landscapes as moral and emotional agents woven into a holistic ethical fabric. Folktales’ cyclical, community-driven narrative structures mirror ecological processes of interdependence and resilience.

By synthesizing environmental humanities with folkloristic, Baatan Ri Fulwari emerges as an “eco-tale” corpus - where nature functions not as passive setting but active moral agent and epistemological force. This approach reframes Detha’s work as narratives of ecological resistance and reverence. It also challenges anthropocentric worldviews and expanding environmental humanities’ canon to include indigenous epistemologies of sustainable coexistence.

Ecological Imagination in Detha’s Tales: Portraying Environment as Moral Agent

Vijaydan Detha’s Baatan Ri Fulwari exemplifies profound ecological imagination that elevates nature from mere backdrop to a moral agent endowed with agency and voice. Through animistic portrayals of animals, trees and water bodies, his narratives dismantle anthropocentric hierarchies by inviting an ethical recalibration grounded in interspecies reciprocity and relationality. This dynamic narratology aligns with Lawrence Buell’s call for “the environment’s active presence in literature” and Plumwood’s “concept of co-agency”, presenting natural elements as interlocutors in human fate and morality. We find that Detha’s storytelling thus enacts an indigenous environmental epistemology, where ecological and cultural worlds coalesce, affirming nature’s intrinsic worth and ethical sovereignty.

Central to this narrative ecology is a decisive de-centering of anthropocentrism, aligning with Lawrence Buell’s insistence that environmental texts “feature the presence of the non-human environment as a living agent” (Buell, 1995, p.87). In The Camel’s Complaint, for instance, the camel transcends its conventional role as mere beast of burden, articulating pain and ethical grievance. This animal subjectivity destabilizes human-centered narratives. This narrative also invites us (as readers) into an ecocentric paradigm grounded in interspecies empathy and shared accountability. "To starve the earth is to starve ourselves; the parched roots cry out for mercy, but deaf ears answer only with greed" (Detha, 1972, p. 23). Similarly, Detha’s portrayal of trees in Bijji ka Ped and sacred groves in Panchotan Ki Chhaya underscores the moral agency of flora by reinforcing Cheryll Glotfelty’s call for a shift “from human-centered to earth-centered” literary approaches (Glotfelty, 1996, p.127). "The flowers bloomed like scattered stars in the arid dust, each petal a triumph over the desert’s cruel embrace" (Detha, 1972, p. 14). These vegetal entities become not just environmental resources but repositories of cultural identity and ecological continuity. These entities reflect emblematic of indigenous stewardship and resistance against commodification.

The narrative voice extends this agency to water sources, as exemplified by The Spirit of the Well, where a well’s drying signifies ecological imbalance caused by human greed and enclosure. This tale critiques privatization and resource hoarding through an ecofeminist lens, resonating with Plumwood’s critique of domination and the necessity of respectful coexistence with nature. The community’s eventual recognition of the well’s spirit reflects indigenous environmental ethics that emphasize relationality and sacredness rather than ownership and exploitation.

Further, during our research we also note that Detha’s tales dismantle the human-animal dichotomy by celebrating animal intelligence and ecological wisdom. In The Clever Parrot, the parrot’s instinctual knowledge enables communal survival. It embodies Buell’s vision of an “environment bearing equal narrative and moral weight” (Buell, 1995, p.113). This inversion of hierarchy not only valorizes non-human epistemologies but also echoes Robin Wall Kimmerer’s principle of “reciprocal relationships with the more-than-human world” (Kimmerer, 2013, p.33). "He knew the secret whispers of the wind and the silent thirst of the earth, and with every seed sown, he wove a promise of life" (Detha, 1972, p. 17). Through motifs of talking animals, enchanted forests and nature-deities, Detha’s folk narratives operate as ecological allegories that reject anthropocentric supremacy by fostering instead “a worldview premised on relationality, reciprocity and vernacular environmentalism” (Guha, 1989, p.44).

Importantly, Detha’s storytelling also embodies a decolonial approach to environmental humanities, countering Western romanticized notions of “pristine nature” that often exclude indigenous practices and knowledge systems. His tales are deeply embedded in the socio-ecological realities of Rajasthan’s desert communities, where survival depends on sustainable and communal management of scarce resources. They also reflect the ecological imprint of cultural practice. By preserving these stories as performative acts of communal memory, Detha safeguards an ecological consciousness that transcends textuality to inform collective identity and resilience.

The narratology of Baatan Ri Fulwari is inherently dynamic and participatory. The collection reflects the oral tradition’s role in transmitting environmental ethics across generations. This narrative fluidity not only preserves cultural essence but also ensures the tales’ relevance in addressing contemporary ecological crises. Detha’s rich metaphoric language and local idioms encode ecological knowledge. His work thus contributes a vital textual ecology that expands environmental humanities discourse by integrating indigenous voices and vernacular ethics.

These tales serve as a compelling corpus for exploring the intersections of folklore and environmental humanities through an ecocritical lens. Detha’s folktales situate within a complex symbolic ecology where the natural world - embodied by desert landscapes, animals, trees and water bodies - is not a passive backdrop but an active moral and narrative agent. Drawing on Plumwood’s concept of “co-agency between humans and non-humans” (Plumwood, 2002, p.154), Detha reimagines Rajasthan’s arid terrain not as an inert wasteland but as an ecotone of resilience and interdependence by challenging dominant perceptions of the desert as barren and lifeless. “The garden of words blossoms only when watered with respect for every living leaf and petal because nature’s voice is soft, but its lessons are deep - listen with humility not to harm a tree which is to silence the earth’s oldest song." (Detha, 1972, p. 107). Here, the desert emerges as an environmental archive by preserving indigenous ecological knowledge encoded in communal memory and storytelling.

In summary, Detha’s Baatan Ri Fulwari advances a sustained critique of anthropocentrism by portraying the environment as a co-participant in narrative and ethical life. Through motifs of agency, reciprocity and indigenous epistemologies, these folktales articulate a living archive of ecological memory that challenges hegemonic environmental paradigms. This framework illuminates how traditional narratives can function as eco-tales dynamic, performative and deeply entwined with the cultural and ecological fabric of Rajasthan advocating for a more inclusive and relational understanding of human-nonhuman coexistence.

We have critically examined that these tales, though traditionally viewed as a cultural folktale through the critical lens of environmental humanities, revealit as a profound eco-tale rich with ecological consciousness and indigenous environmental ethics. They also convey cultural and social norms leading towards ecological consciousness. They emerge as an active site for exploring human-nature interdependence, embedded within the oral traditions of Rajasthan. This process emphasizes literature’s potential to foreground ecological concerns.

Unlike conventional interpretations that treat nature as mere backdrop, Baatan Ri Fulwari portrays the natural world - desert flora, fauna, wells and sacred landscapes - as dynamic participants shaping human existence. This relational ontology challenges anthropocentric binaries by highlighting a symbiotic co-evolution of human and non-human worlds. Moreover, these folktale functions as a vessel for transmitting environmental values, where oral motifs such as rituals, animal wisdom and sacred sites embody survival strategies in arid geographies and promote nature as kin and moral guide. By framing these stories as eco-tales, the paper broadens the environmental humanities’ scope to include indigenous oral traditions, offering a critical counterpoint to dominant Western ecological narratives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have also scrutinised that revisiting Baatan Ri Fulwari through the lens of environmental humanities transforms our understanding of folklore from static tradition to dynamic ecological discourse. These stories show how the desert, which is often caricatured as lifeless, sustains a rich interplay of environmental and social life. By elevating nonhuman voices, sacralizing natural elements and resisting commodification, Detha seems to construct an indigenous ecological ethics that remains deeply relevant today. In reading these folktales as eco-tales, we not only preserve a literary heritage but also recover a mode of thinking where nature is not just background - but presence, teacher, healer and kin. Detha’s Baatan Ri Fulwariis not merely folklore but a literary archive of ecological insight that critiques anthropocentrism. They advocate for reciprocity with the environment. Reinterpreted as eco-tales are vital tools for cultivating environmental ethics and imagining sustainable futures in the Anthropocene. They serve not only as cultural memories but as blueprints for an ecologically attuned world. They affirm the enduring relevance of indigenous knowledge in addressing contemporary environmental crises.

Works Cited

Armstrong, Patricia. “Ecofeminism and the Politics of Folklore.” Environmental Humanities Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, 2005, pp. 45–63.

Berkes, Fikret. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. 3rd ed., Routledge, 2012, p.145.

Bookchin, Murray. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Cheshire Books, 1982.

Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Harvard University Press, 2005, pp.87, 113, 183.

Detha, Vijaydan. Baatan Ri Fulwari [Garden of Tales]. Rajasthani Folklore Series, 1991.

---. Baatan Ri Fulwari [translated selections]. Lokayat, 1974, pp.14, 17, 23, 107.

Dube, S. C. “Rural Folklore and Ecological Knowledge in Rajasthan.” Indian Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, 2010, pp. 123–136.

Dundes, Alan. The Study of Folklore. Prentice-Hall, 1965.

Glotfelty, Cheryll, and Harold Fromm, editors. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. University of Georgia Press, 1996.

Guha, Ramachandra. “Radical American Environmentalism and Wilderness Preservation: A Third World Critique.” Environmental Ethics, vol. 11, no. 1, 1989, pp. 71–83.

Joshi, Ramesh. “Narratives of Rajasthan: An Exploration of Social Ethics in Vijaydan Detha’s Folktales.” Journal of Folklore Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, 2015, pp. 55–70.

Kimmerer, Robin Wall. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions, 2013.

Plumwood, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge, 1993.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Wagle, Neha. “The Oral Tradition and Cultural Memory in Rajasthan.” Folklore Studies Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 1, 2014, pp. 77–94.