☛ Call for Paper for Special Issue on Cinema and Culture (Vol. 7, No. 3, July, 2026). Last Date of Submission: 30 June, 2026.
☛ Creative Section (Vol. 7, No. 2, April 2026) will be published in May, 2026. Keep visiting our website for further updates.
☛ Colleges/Universities may contact us for publication of their conference/seminar papers at creativeflightjournal@gmail.com

Dalits: Margins of Indian Society

 


Dalits: Margins of Indian Society

 

Dr. Andrey Shastri,

Amity University, Lucknow,

Uttar Pradesh, India.

 

Abstract: Even in the modern era, the caste system continues to play a significant role and occupies a distinct position within India’s social class structure. Dalits have historically been perceived as undereducated and have been subjected to severe exploitation within society. Even today, many Dalits are compelled to struggle for basic survival and livelihood. Contemporary Dalit communities face various forms of violence, with caste-based discrimination by upper-caste groups remaining one of the most critical factors contributing to their marginalized condition. The persistent reluctance of dominant castes to accept Dalits in positions of social, economic, and political authority further reinforces this inequality. This paper attempts to present a comprehensive review of the social, educational, economic, and political status of Dalits in India, while highlighting the key issues and challenges confronting them.

Keywords:  Dalits, women, untouchability, India, education.

Introduction

Indian society has historically been structured around the caste system, which has deeply influenced social relations, access to resources, and opportunities for different communities. Among the most marginalized groups within this structure are the Dalits, who have faced centuries of exclusion, discrimination, and social oppression. Despite constitutional safeguards and policy interventions in independent India, caste-based inequalities continue to shape the everyday realities of Dalit communities.

In country like India, caste was something very deep rooted in the social structure. In short, people were defined sometime by their caste only. India is a rich country with its tremendous mixed cultures, sub cultures and traditions. It has the richest heritage and civilization(s). Furthermore, India is moving ahead in the field of business, in the field of science, in the field of technology, in terms of scientific research technique and many more things. Undoubtedly, India is growing rapidly through its efforts and hardworking steps. Day by day with its efforts it is becoming the fastest developing countries in the world. But after watching the daily news, or even reading the articles in the newspaper, the condition of Dalits did not seems to be improved. There is not much changes in the social attitudes in the behaviour of upper caste people. India is still in the grip of caste system. It is not away from the shackles of social hierarchies of the society. The sections of the people who are considered as Dalits or Marginalized are also the important section of Indian society. They also play an important role in the development of a society, development of a country, or development in terms of a nation. Different studies and reports reveal that they are the victims of the any kind of violence.

 

Dalits: Identity and Social Status

 

Dalit is a term used in India to refer to communities that were historically placed outside the traditional caste hierarchy and subjected to social exclusion, discrimination, and untouchability. The word Dalit comes from the Sanskrit root “dal”, meaning broken, oppressed, crushed, or downtrodden. It signifies not just economic poverty but a condition of systematic social oppression and denial of human dignity.

 

In contemporary usage, Dalit is a self-assertive and political identity, adopted to challenge caste-based injustice and to demand equality, rights, and social justice. The term Dalit refers to those communities in India who have historically suffered social exclusion, caste-based discrimination, and economic deprivation. Traditionally positioned at the lowest levels of the caste hierarchy, Dalits were denied access to education, land ownership, religious spaces, and dignified occupations. This systemic marginalization resulted in generations of social and economic backwardness.

 

In modern India, the term Dalit has evolved from a label of oppression to an identity of resistance and assertion. Influenced by the ideas of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, Dalit consciousness emphasizes human dignity, equality, and social justice. Despite constitutional protections and affirmative action policies, many Dalits continue to face discrimination, violence, and unequal access to opportunities, highlighting the persistence of caste-based inequalities in Indian society.

 

They are the ones who lived within the Hindu traditional society, but had very limited freedom. The majorities of the Dalits or minorities are poor, socially backward, and usually deprived from all basic needs. They had no rights on anything. They are also deprived from educational opportunities. Although some of the Dalits had very good jobs and good educational background but still more people are lagging behind in every aspect. Every day in most of the sector they face multiple discriminations in various forms. Earlier, they named as "Untouchables" by the Caste Hindus. Later on, they were recognized as 'Depressed classes' and 'scheduled castes'. These phrases came out by the Government Act of 1935. Mohandas K. Gandhi coined the word 'Harijan', which means "the children of God." But this term was not welcomed by the Dalits because it did not adequately describe their condition. They are not treated even as human beings leave alone being respected as people of God. They are not treated equally in this society.

From a theoretical perspective, Dalit denotes a structurally produced condition of social marginality rooted in the caste system rather than merely an identity based on economic deprivation. Dalit status is historically constructed through practices of untouchability, ritual exclusion, and graded inequality, which systematically denied certain communities access to social capital, political power, and cultural legitimacy. The caste order institutionalized hierarchy by assigning hereditary occupations and enforcing social distance, thereby reproducing inequality across generations.

 

Sociological and critical caste theories view Dalits as a subordinated social group whose marginalization is maintained through intersecting structures of caste, class, power, and ideology. Dalit identity, therefore, represents both a lived experience of oppression and a site of political resistance. Drawing on Ambedkarite thought, the concept of Dalit challenges Brahmanical social order and calls for the annihilation of caste as a prerequisite for social democracy. Despite constitutional guarantees of equality, the persistence of caste-based discrimination reveals the limits of legal reforms in transforming deeply entrenched social structures.

 

India’s caste system assigns individuals a hierarchical social status largely rooted in traditional Hindu beliefs. Beyond the four varna categories, Dalits are positioned outside this framework and are constitutionally classified as Scheduled Castes. Occupying the lowest rungs of the social hierarchy, Dalits have historically faced multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination. These include restricted access to education, healthcare, housing, and employment opportunities, as well as enforced social segregation.

 

The scale of discrimination against Dalits is particularly significant due to the vast number of people affected solely on the basis of caste identity. India is home to more than 200 million Dalits, making caste-based exclusion a major human rights concern. As noted by Paul Diwakar, a Dalit activist associated with the National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights, India has approximately 600,000 villages, and in nearly every village Dalits are compelled to live in segregated settlements located on the outskirts.

 

Demographically, Dalits constitute around 16.6 per cent of India’s total population. According to the 2011 Census, nearly 20.14 crore individuals were recorded as belonging to various Scheduled Castes, reflecting a significant increase from 16.66 crore reported in the 2001 Census. These figures highlight both the numerical strength of Dalit communities and the continuing urgency of addressing caste-based inequalities in Indian society.

 

Within the Dalit community, there are many divisions into sub-castes. Dalits are divided into leather workers, street sweepers, cobblers, agricultural workers, and manual “scavengers”, these are the different sub-divisions of this caste. Approximately three-quarters of the Dalit workforce are in the agricultural sector of the economy. A majority of the country’s forty million people who are bonded labourers are Dalits.  These kinds of job   rarely provide them income to feed their families or to send their children to school. As a result, due to which many Dalits are impoverished, uneducated, and illiterate and backward.

 

Since from the very early times, Dalits have been oppressed, culturally subjugated, and politically marginalized. Even sometime the Dalits are not allowed to sit in front or along with the high caste people, they are also not allowed to eat with, and not even allowed to marry. Discrimination for Dalits does not end if they convert from Hinduism to any other religion.

Dalit and Education

 

Education has been regarded as a crucial instrument for the social emancipation and empowerment of Dalits. Historically, Dalits were systematically denied access to formal education through caste-based restrictions, reinforcing their social and economic marginalization. The exclusion from knowledge systems functioned as a mechanism of domination, ensuring the reproduction of caste hierarchy across generations.

 

In post-independence India, constitutional provisions, affirmative action policies, and reservation in educational institutions have expanded educational access for Dalits. However, deep structural inequalities continue to shape educational outcomes. High dropout rates, poor quality of schooling, economic deprivation, caste-based discrimination within educational spaces, and digital divides remain significant barriers. From an Ambedkarite perspective, education is not merely a means of mobility but a transformative force essential for achieving social equality, dignity, and democratic participation.

 

The education plays a crucial and important role in the upliftment of the society and it members. Education is the means to achieve equality at all levels in a society. Universally it is declared as a fundamental right, and to ensure that everybody must have equal opportunities in education sector. It is considered a powerful instrument in the process of overcoming inequalities and accelerating social transformation. It can help to establish a new social order which should be based on equality, liberty, and fraternity. Education creates awareness among people and gives voice to people to speak up. To overcome from this situation different schemes created to make growth in terms of education. Education acts as an emancipator because without education no human can be emancipated.

 

Plato has visualized education as a means to create an ideal stat and planned a curriculum and a structure of education, which would produce his ideal republic. Karl Mannheism portrayed the aims of education in a social, historical and visualized the possibilities of progressive social change through education. It is well said that education plays an important role as well as it can be a great emancipator.

 

It is well said that “Education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today.” Education is the first towards the progress and development. Education is the most powerful agent for bringing desired changes in any society. Education has an immense impact on the human society. Education  placed as one of major weapon to liberate Dalits in India by many Dalits leaders like Mahatama Phule, Savitri Bai Phule, and most important leader the so called as Dalit Massiha, none another than Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, these leaders put their every best efforts in uplift lifting the Dalits people in society.

 

Education could give confidence to the exploited ones to fight against the injustice and oppression. But Dalits of India are lagging behind in terms of education, it is still like a dream to achieve it. Eve today in this modern time, where the discussion was about the development and discrimination against the Dalits is present throughout all the stairs of education. Number of dropout rates among the Dalits is high due to their social and economic factors. The literacy rate of SCs in 2011 is 66.1% and total literacy rate is 73%.

 

In context to women, the literacy rate of SC women is about 42% in 2001, increased to 56.5% in 2011. As the data shows that woman condition are very deplorable in every field. They face a lot of discrimination being a woman and being a Dalit woman. They also suffer from patriarchal nature of the society, which don't allow them to move ahead in their life. The number of dropout rates is also higher among girl children of Dalits. The socio-economic nature of their family did not allow them to pursue higher dreams in their life. They are more indulge in the house hold activities, helping their mothers in the kitchen, taking care of their siblings, poverty, less education of their parents and many more others factors hampers their educational rates in their life.

 

Systemic Exclusion and Social Oppression

 

At present, Dalits constitute approximately 16.2 per cent of India’s total population; however, their control over the nation’s resources remains extremely limited, estimated at less than five per cent. Nearly half of the Dalit population continues to live below the poverty line. A significant proportion of Dalits engaged in agriculture are landless or marginal agricultural labourers, reflecting their continued economic vulnerability. Access to basic amenities such as safe drinking water, electricity, and sanitation remains severely inadequate, with fewer than ten per cent of Dalit households able to afford these necessities, underscoring their deplorable living conditions.

 

Dalits are also disproportionately affected by crimes and atrocities, often making them daily victims of caste-based violence. Many such crimes remain unreported due to fear of retaliation, social pressure, and lack of trust in law enforcement agencies. Even when reported, cases are frequently ignored or inadequately addressed by the police. Between 1992 and 2000, a total of 334,459 cognisable offences against Scheduled Castes were registered nationwide, indicating the persistent nature of caste violence. More than six decades after Independence, Indian society continues to be deeply afflicted by the entrenched caste system, with Dalits remaining one of the most vulnerable, marginalized, and brutalized communities.

 

Dalit women, in particular, face multiple and intersecting forms of oppression. Certain forms of violence are disproportionately directed at them, rooted in both caste and gender hierarchies. Often unaware of their legal rights, Dalit women are vulnerable to exploitation by dominant caste groups, law enforcement agencies, and even the judicial system. They are subjected to exploitation not only by upper-caste men and women but also, at times, by Dalit men within their own communities. Domestic violence, alcoholism, gambling, and the appropriation of women’s wages by male family members further aggravate their condition, frequently pushing entire families into extreme poverty and hunger.

 

In rural areas, Dalit women are commonly employed as agricultural labourers on lands owned by upper-caste landlords, where they receive meager wages and endure exploitative working conditions. Recent data further highlight the severity of social violence: during the first half of 2019, 72 mob attacks were reported across the country, of which 28 targeted Dalits. In eight of these cases, Dalit victims were lynched to death. Such incidents reveal the intense and layered nature of oppression faced by Dalit communities, particularly Dalit women.

These realities underline the urgent need for a fundamental transformation in social attitudes across caste and religious lines. Recognizing women as integral and equal participants in society is essential, as meaningful social development remains incomplete without their dignity, security, and empowerment.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the persistence of caste-based inequalities in contemporary India highlights the limited transformation of deeply entrenched social structures despite constitutional safeguards and policy interventions. Dalits, particularly Dalit women, continue to experience systematic exclusion, economic deprivation, and multiple forms of violence rooted in the intersection of caste and gender. While legal frameworks and affirmative action have created opportunities for social mobility, their impact remains constrained by discriminatory social attitudes and institutional failures.

Addressing Dalit marginalization requires more than legal reform; it demands a fundamental change in social consciousness, effective implementation of protective laws, and inclusive development policies that prioritize education, economic empowerment, and gender justice. The realization of a truly democratic and egalitarian society is possible only when caste hierarchies are dismantled and the dignity, rights, and agency of Dalits — especially Dalit women—are fully recognized and upheld.

Works Cited

 

Sabharwal, N.S., and Sonalkar W. “Dalit Women in India: At The Crossroad of Gender, Class, and Caste, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 2015.

Ghatak Progya, “Societal Status of Dalit Women in India”, Research Gate, 2011.

Ambedkar, B. R. Annihilation of Caste. Bombay Publication, 1936.

Rege, S. “Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of ‘Difference’ and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 33, no. 44, 1988.