When Plants Strike Back: Reading Wells’s “The Flowering of the
Strange Orchid”
Sudipta Bag,
Assistant
Professor,
Department
of English,
Sarojini
Naidu College for Women, Kolkata,
West
Bengal, India.
Abstract: This paper reads H. G. Wells’s short story “The Flowering
of the Strange Orchid” (1894) through the critical posthumanist framework,
bringing together posthumanism, nature, and nonhuman agency. In the story, an
orchid collector acquires a rare specimen whose tendrils ensnare and nearly
kill him, reversing the usual colonial and scientific narrative in which the
human subject masters exotic nature. I argue that Wells figures the orchid not
as decorative background but as an active, quasi-agentive participant in a
distributed network that includes colonial plant collection, domestic
interiors, human physiology, and the affective economy of desire. Drawing on Bruno Latour’s account of nonhumans as
“actants” and inscription devices, I show how the orchid mediates perception,
embodiment, and power within the story’s network, collapsing the distinction
between passive plant and active human. The plant’s apparent intentionality—its
timing, its intoxicating scent, its targeted grip on the collector’s
throat—invites a reading in which vegetal life assumes a role analogous to that
played by plague in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man and by the Martians in Wells’s
The War of the Worlds: a nonhuman force that reveals the contingency of human
exceptionalism. At the same time, the orchid is inseparable from imperial
circuits of extraction and display; as an imported, exotic specimen cultivated
for prestige, it crystallises how colonial modernity reorganises “nature” as
collectible capital only to be threatened by that same “nature” when it resists
containment. Through close reading of Wells’s language of scent, colour, and
enclosure, the paper argues that “The Flowering of the Strange Orchid”
anticipates posthuman ecologies in which human bodies are porous, vulnerable
nodes within vegetal and imperial assemblages. By situating this short story
alongside Wells’s later invasion narratives and contemporaneous botanical
discourse, I suggest that Wells offers an early literary experiment in thinking
with plants as co-agents rather than scenery. The paper thus contributes to
ongoing conversations in critical posthumanism and ecocriticism by
foregrounding the intersection of nature, empire, and nonhuman agency in late-Victorian
short fiction.
Keywords: Posthuman, nonhuman agency, plant agency, colonial botany, actor‑network theory
H. G. Wells’s short story “The
Flowering of the Strange Orchid” (1894) at first appears to be a minor
curiosity in his oeuvre, a botanical gothic tale in which an orchid collector
is nearly killed by his most prized specimen. Yet when approached through a
critical posthumanist lens, the story unfolds as a concentrated meditation on
the entanglement of nature, empire, and nonhuman agency in the late Victorian imagination. The
“strange orchid” is not a decorative backdrop for human drama but a nonhuman
actor that exposes the fragility of the human subject and the instability of
colonial mastery over nature. Drawing
on concepts from critical posthumanism, ecocriticism, and science and
technology studies—especially Bruno Latour’s notion of nonhuman “actants” and
inscription—this article argues that the story anticipates posthuman ecologies
in which human bodies are porous nodes within vegetal and imperial assemblages
(Latour 63–65). I suggest that Wells’s orchid functions analogously to the
plague in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man
and the Martians in The War of the Worlds:
as a nonhuman force that destabilizes the category of the human and mirrors
back to Britain the violence and vulnerability embedded in its own imperial
practices (Shelley; Wells, War of the
Worlds). By foregrounding the agency of an exotic plant imported through
colonial networks, Wells’s tale imaginatively reconfigures the relationship
between “civilized” collector and “passive” nature, turning the former into
prey and the latter into a co-producer of terror, embodiment, and meaning. The analysis proceeds in three stages. The first section
situates the story within a critical posthumanist and ecocritical framework and
sketches its narrative outline. The second traces how Wells constructs the
orchid as an actant through language of smell, color, and movement, and how
this intersects with histories of colonial plant hunting. The third section
reads the story’s climactic scene as an experiment in posthuman embodiment and
vulnerability, arguing that the orchid’s attack exposes the fragility of human
sovereignty and the limits of anthropocentric epistemologies.
Critical posthumanism challenges
the foundational humanist distinction between autonomous human subjects and
inert nonhuman objects, emphasizing instead relational ontologies, distributed
agency, and the co‑constitution of humans and nonhumans (Braidotti 1–5; Ferrando
27–29). Within this framework, nature is not a passive resource but an active
participant in the formation of subjectivities, political orders, and
epistemologies. Ecocritical extensions of posthumanism—variously termed
material ecocriticism, posthuman ecologies, or environmental
posthumanism—foreground the agency of animals, plants, landscapes, and
elemental forces in literary texts, often through the concept of “storied
matter”: the idea that material entities bear and transmit narratives (Iovino
and Oppermann 451–53).
Wells’s fiction is especially
amenable to such readings. In The War of
the Worlds, the Martians and the microbes that ultimately destroy them
rearrange planetary hierarchies (Wells, War
of the Worlds). In The Island of Doctor
Moreau, vivisected animals blur the line between human and beast (Wells, Island of Doctor Moreau). In The Time Machine, evolutionary forces
split humanity into Eloi and Morlocks (Wells, Time Machine). “The Flowering of the Strange Orchid” offers a condensed
version of this pattern in vegetal form. Here, nature, in the guise of a rare
orchid, retaliates against human domination and demonstrates its capacity to
act, to “respond,” and to reorganize the terms of the encounter.
The story centers on Winter‑Wedderburn, a nervous, rather
sedentary man whose chief passion is collecting orchids (Wells, “Strange
Orchid”). He acquires a strange bulb from an explorer who discovered it in a
South American swamp, where a previous collector had disappeared under mysterious
circumstances. Once planted and coaxed into bloom, the orchid produces an
intoxicating perfume and ghostly pale flowers, and then, in the climactic
scene, sends its aerial roots and tendrils around Wedderburn’s throat and body,
draining his strength until he is rescued at the last moment. The narrative
thus stages a reversal: the collector becomes the collected, the classifier
becomes the specimen, and the exotic plant reveals itself as both deadly and
agentive.
To understand the stakes of this
reversal, we must consider the story’s techno‑historical context. The late nineteenth century saw an
“orchid fever” in Britain, with wealthy collectors and professional “orchid
hunters” engaged in global expeditions to procure rare species from tropical
regions (Endersby 45–49). This botanical imperialism was embedded in wider
colonial economies of extraction, classification, and display. Wells’s story
taps into this culture but subverts its assumptions: the “strange orchid” is
not an inert trophy; it is a co‑producer of risk and desire. The plant’s journey from
tropical swamp to English conservatory exemplifies a global network in which
nature, capital, and imperial power are intimately entwined—and in which
nonhuman actors can, and do, strike back.
Wells’s description of the orchid
is carefully calibrated to dislodge the plant from the realm of mere object.
From its first appearance, it is marked as uncanny: the bulb is “dark, almost
black,” with “queer fleshy ribs and points,” suggesting something more animal than
vegetable (Wells, “Strange Orchid”). As it grows, the plant becomes
increasingly anthropomorphic and predatory, with aerial roots likened to
tentacles and its opening flowers compared to “pallid faces” or “ghostly
things.” The narrative voice hovers between scientific observation and gothic
suggestion, refusing to stabilize the plant within familiar categories. One key strategy through which Wells animates the orchid
is the emphasis on scent. When the plant finally flowers, the air is filled
with an “intoxicating” perfume that affects not only Winter‑Wedderburn but also the reader’s
sense of distance from the scene (Wells, “Strange Orchid”). Scent is difficult
to represent visually or conceptually; it suggests invisible, pervasive
influence. In this story, the orchid’s perfume operates as an invisible agent
that precedes and accompanies its physical attack, loosening the boundaries of
the human body and mind. Winter‑Wedderburn feels “strangely faint and dreamy,” and his
companion also notes the smell’s overpowering quality. The plant thus acts
chemically on human perception and physiology, drawing him closer even as it
prepares to ensnare him.
The orchid’s aerial roots and
tendrils further emphasize its mobility and apparent intentionality. Wells
describes them as reaching out, fumbling, and then gripping their victim’s neck
and shoulders (Wells, “Strange Orchid”). This is not the passive drifting of
vines but a coordinated, directional movement that easily lends itself to the
language of intentional action. Here the plant’s morphology becomes a vehicle
for narrative agency: its roots are both literal organs of support and
metaphorical extensions of desire and predation. The conservatory, filled with
pots, glass, and human‑made structures, becomes an unanticipated stage for vegetal
violence.
At the same time, the orchid is
enmeshed in technological and imperial mediation. It reaches England only
because explorers and collectors have transported it across oceans, likely
along with soil, spores, and other organisms. It is cultivated in a carefully
regulated indoor space, with temperature, humidity, and light controlled by
human design. In Latourian terms, the orchid’s agency is distributed across a
network that includes explorers, ships, greenhouses, gardening manuals, and
economic circuits of value (Latour 178–80). Its attack on Winter‑Wedderburn is therefore not a
simple “rebellion of nature” but a complex event produced by the intersection
of plant vitality, colonial circulation, and bourgeois domestic space. Nature
acts here, but its action is already shaped by empire and technology.
The climactic scene, in which
Winter‑Wedderburn
is found unconscious, entangled in the orchid’s roots and bathed in its scent,
crystallizes the story’s posthuman implications. The human body is shown as
radically vulnerable: the throat, a conduit for air and voice, is constricted;
the nervous system is overwhelmed by the perfume; consciousness fades (Wells,
“Strange Orchid”). The image of the collector lying beneath the orchid, his
“face white and drawn” while the plant’s flowers bloom overhead, visually
inverts the usual hierarchy of human over plant. This inversion invites a rethinking of embodiment in relation to
nature. Rather than an autonomous subject encountering an inert object, we see
two bodies—one human, one vegetal—interacting in ways that profoundly alter
both. The orchid uses the human body as a support and perhaps as a source of
moisture or nutrients; the human body, in turn, manifests its dependence on
oxygen, circulatory function, and olfactory signals (Alaimo 4–7). The story
thus foregrounds what might be called a posthuman ecology of vulnerability:
human life is contingent on environmental and interspecies relations that can
turn deadly when taken for granted.
The imperial dimension of this
vulnerability is crucial. Winter‑Wedderburn’s orchid collection is made possible by
colonial botany: the systematic extraction of plant life from colonized
territories for scientific, economic, and aesthetic purposes (Drayton 92–99).
Wells hints at this through the backstory of the orchid’s discovery in a
“feverish” tropical swamp, where the previous collector died mysteriously
(Wells, “Strange Orchid”). The strange plant, associated with that death,
enters the domestic sphere as a symbol of prestige and adventure. Its eventual
attack can be read as a kind of vegetal blowback, a “return of the repressed”
in which the costs of imperial extraction are paid in the collector’s own blood
and breath.
This reading resonates with broader
patterns in Wells’s work, where imperial power is repeatedly destabilized by
encounters with the nonhuman. In The War
of the Worlds, Britain’s role as colonizer is inverted when Martians treat
humans as animals and the fate of “inferior races” elsewhere is invoked by the
narrator as an analogy for Britain’s predicament (Wells, War of the Worlds 8–10). In “The Flowering of the Strange Orchid,”
the scale is smaller but the logic similar: the Englishman who presumed to own
and display the exotic plant discovers that his control is an illusion. The
plant’s agency, though non‑conscious in any human sense, nonetheless disrupts the
colonial fantasy of one‑way domination of nature. The story thus participates in an
emerging recognition, however ambivalent, that empire is not a stable,
unilateral project but a risky engagement with complex more‑than‑human worlds.
Moreover, the story’s conclusion
does not resolve this tension through a triumphant human reassertion of
mastery. Winter‑Wedderburn is saved not by his own strength or rational planning
but by the intervention of his housekeeper, who cuts away the tendrils and
opens a window (Wells, “Strange Orchid”). The orchid is destroyed, but the
experience leaves a lingering unease. The narrative closes with a tone of
nervous laughter and attempted minimization rather than serene control. The
reader is left with the sense that the human characters have narrowly survived
an encounter they did not fully understand and could easily have los t. From a critical posthumanist perspective, this unresolved
unease is significant. It suggests that Wells is less interested in reaffirming
human supremacy than in exploring the precariousness of human embodiment in a
world of powerful, sometimes opaque nonhuman forces (Braidotti 65–68). The
“strange orchid” functions as a figure for such forces, compressing into a
single plant the entangled histories of colonial expansion, scientific
curiosity, aesthetic obsession, and vegetal vitality. The human subject, far
from standing above this entanglement, is fully immersed in it and vulnerable
to its unpredictable outcomes.
“The Flowering of the Strange Orchid” may be a
relatively short and often overlooked piece in Wells’s body of work, but a
posthuman reading reveals it as a remarkably rich site for thinking about the
intersection of nature, empire, and nonhuman agency in late‑Victorian literature. Through
careful attention to botanical detail, sensory description, and narrative
reversal, Wells transforms an exotic orchid into a nonhuman actor that exposes
the fragility of human sovereignty and the violence embedded in colonial
encounters with nature.
By situating the story within a
broader critical posthumanist and ecocritical framework, we can see how Wells
anticipates contemporary debates about plant agency, material ecologies, and
the decentering of the human (Iovino and Oppermann 451–55; Ferrando 32–36). The
orchid is not merely a gothic prop; it is a participant in a distributed
network that includes explorers, ships, greenhouses, domestic labor, and the
anxieties of a culture increasingly aware of its dependence on—and entanglement
with—more‑than‑human worlds. Its attack on Winter‑Wedderburn thus carries implications that reach beyond
individual horror to touch on the structural vulnerabilities of a civilization
that treats nature as collectible property while remaining blind to its own
embeddedness in ecological and imperial systems.
In this sense, “The Flowering of
the Strange Orchid” stands alongside Wells’s more famous invasion narratives as
an early literary experiment in posthuman thinking. By allowing an exotic plant
to seize the narrative and nearly the life of its human collector, Wells offers
a vivid reminder that the human is never alone, never sovereign, and never
immune from the agency of the natural world it seeks to master.
Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily
Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana UP, 2010.
Braidotti, Rosi. The
Posthuman. Polity, 2013.
Drayton, Richard. Nature’s
Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the “Improvement” of the World.
Yale UP, 2000.
Endersby, Jim. Imperial
Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science. U of Chicago
P, 2008.
Ferrando, Francesca. “Posthumanism, Transhumanism,
Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms.” Existenz, vol. 8, no. 2, 2013, pp. 26–32.
Iovino, Serenella, and Serpil Oppermann. “Material
Ecocriticism: Materiality, Agency, and Models of Narrativity.” Ecozon@, vol. 3, no. 1, 2012, pp. 75–91.
Latour, Bruno. Science
in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard
UP, 1987.
Shelley, Mary. The
Last Man. Edited by Anne McWhir, Broadview, 1996.
Wells, H. G. “The Flowering of the Strange Orchid.” 1894. The Country of the Blind and Other Stories,
Odhams Press, n.d.
—. The Island of
Doctor Moreau. 1896. Penguin, 2005.
—. The Time Machine.
1895. Oxford World’s Classics, 2010.
—. The War of the
Worlds. 1898. Edited by Patrick Parrinder, Penguin, 2005.