☛ The Creative Section of October issue (Vol. 7, No. 4) will be released by the end of November, 2026.
☛ Call for Paper for Special Issue on Dalit Struggle, Protest, and Resilience (Vol. 8, No. 1, January, 2027). Last Date of Submission: 31 December, 2026.
☛ Colleges/Universities may contact us for publication of their conference/seminar papers at creativeflightjournal@gmail.com

Authenticity and Anxiety: The Psychological Bifurcation of Folk Artists in 21st-Century North Bengal

 


Authenticity and Anxiety: The Psychological Bifurcation of Folk Artists in 21st-Century North Bengal

 

Dr. Amrita Sengupta Dutta,

Guest Faculty,

Department of Dance, Faculty of Fine Arts,

Rabindra Bharati University,

Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

 

Abstract: This paper investigates the psychological and cultural dissonance experienced by traditional folk artists in the North Bengal region of India as they navigate the demands of the 21st-century cultural economy. While globalization has provided unprecedented economic opportunities for folk performers through tourism and digital media, it has simultaneously imposed a condition of "performative authenticity." The study explores how artists from the Rajbanshi, Toto, and Rabha communities experience a bifurcation of self: the "ritual self" rooted in community tradition, and the "commodified self" constructed for external consumption. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, semi-structured interviews, and postcolonial theory, this research argues that this bifurcation generates a unique form of "authenticity anxiety." The paper further examines how digital platforms and heritage festivals act as double-edged swords, validating indigenous art forms while simultaneously freezing them in a static, exoticized past. Ultimately, the study calls for a recalibration of cultural policies to prioritize the psychological well-being of artists alongside economic sustainability, arguing that the preservation of intangible cultural heritage must include the mental health of its practitioners.

Keywords: Folk Artists, North Bengal, Authenticity, Cultural Commodification, Identity, Psychological Bifurcation, Heritage Tourism.

Introduction

The cultural landscape of North Bengal, characterized by the verdant Dooars, the shifting currents of the Teesta and Torsa rivers, and the rugged Himalayan foothills, is home to a rich tapestry of indigenous communities. The Rajbanshis, the Totos, the Rabhas, and the Mech, among others, have historically nurtured distinct oral traditions, dance forms, and musical practices intrinsically linked to their agricultural cycles, animistic beliefs, and communal rites of passage (Basu 45). These art forms were never static; they evolved organically with the community's changing relationship with nature and the divine. However, the advent of the 21st century has thrust these traditionally isolated traditions into the volatile arena of the global marketplace. State-sponsored tourism, heritage festivals, and the relentless proliferation of social media platforms have transformed the folk artist from a community ritualist into a "cultural entrepreneur."

This transition, while offering a reprieve from agrarian poverty and providing economic empowerment, has engendered a profound psychological conflict. The contemporary folk artist in North Bengal is constantly negotiating between two opposing imperatives: the need to preserve the ontological purity of their art for their community, and the need to package, modify, and perform it for the consumption of outsiders—tourists, urban audiences, and digital consumers. This paper posits that this negotiation results in a "psychological bifurcation"—a splitting of the artistic self that leads to what this study terms "Authenticity Anxiety."

The central research questions guiding this inquiry are: How do folk artists in North Bengal perceive the difference between their ritual performances and their commercial performances? What psychological mechanisms do they employ to cope with the demands of cultural commodification? And, how do digital media and state cultural policies exacerbate or alleviate this anxiety? By analyzing the performative strategies and internal conflicts of these artists, this paper seeks to illuminate the unseen mental toll of cultural globalization, moving beyond economic analyses to foreground the emotional and psychological resilience of the artists themselves.

Theoretical Framework: The Commodification of Authenticity

To understand the plight of the North Bengal folk artist, one must engage with the sociological concept of "staged authenticity," initially theorized by Dean MacCannell. MacCannell argues that in modern tourism, local cultures are often forced to create "staged" backdrops that cater to the tourist's desire for an "authentic" experience. This creates a hall of mirrors where the authentic and the artificial blur, and the host community begins to perform their own identity as a spectacle for the guest (MacCannell 91). In the context of North Bengal, this manifests in the transformation of ritual dances into timed, twenty-minute hotel performances. The artist is no longer performing for the deities or the community harvest; they are performing for a camera lens and a paying audience.

Postcolonial theorists like Homi K. Bhabha further complicate this by introducing the concept of "mimicry" and "hybridity" (Bhabha 86). The folk artist is forced to mimic the expectations of the urban consumer while attempting to retain a sliver of their indigenous identity. This leads to a hybridized performance that satisfies neither the traditional elders nor the modern audience fully. Bhabha's notion of the "third space" becomes crucial here—a space where the artist negotiates between the traditional and the modern, creating a new, often conflicted, identity.

Furthermore, Arjun Appadurai's concept of "mediascapes" and "ethnoscapes" provides a lens to understand how global flows of media and people shape local identities (Appadurai 35). The North Bengal folk artist is now part of a global mediascape, where their performance is judged not by local elders, but by an abstract, globalized standard of "tribal" or "folk" aesthetics. This external gaze is internalized, leading to the psychological bifurcation this paper seeks to explore.

Methodology

This research employs a qualitative, ethnographic methodology conducted over a period of six months across the Jalpaiguri, Alipurduar, and Cooch Behar districts of North Bengal. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 35 folk artists, ranging from established troupe leaders to young performers. The participants included members of the Rajbanshi, Toto, Rabha, and Mech communities. The interviews focused on the artists' emotional experiences, their perceptions of audience expectations, the changes they have made to their traditional art forms to suit modern demands, and their aspirations for the future.

In addition to interviews, participant observation was conducted at four major cultural festivals, including the Uttar Banga Sanskriti Utsav and local tourism events in the Dooars. This allowed for the observation of the physical and emotional transformation of artists before, during, and after their performances. Finally, discourse analysis was performed on digital content uploaded by these artists on platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. The digital content was analyzed to understand how artists curate their online personas and how they navigate the tension between tradition and algorithmic virality.

The Bifurcated Self: Ritual vs. Performance

The primary finding of this study is the pervasive sense of a "bifurcated self" among the respondents. The artists explicitly differentiate between what they call "Asol Porbo" (the real festival/ritual) and "Dekhano Porbo" (the show/display).

One veteran Rajbanshi dancer, who has been performing for over three decades, explained, "When we dance the Masan dance in our village during the Sital Puja, it is a prayer. We are possessed by the spirit. The drumming is not for entertainment; it is a summons. But when we dance the same steps on a stage in Siliguri for a tourism event, we are just moving our bodies. We smile when we are supposed to be in a trance. It feels like lying."

This bifurcation is not merely a professional adjustment; it is a psychological splitting. The artists report feeling a sense of guilt and alienation from their own cultural heritage. They are forced to "perform" their identity in ways that strip it of its spiritual efficacy. The anxiety stems from the fear that the younger generation will only learn the "staged" version of the dance, thereby permanently severing the community from its ritual roots. A young Toto artist echoed this sentiment, stating, "My grandfather knew the songs for the forest spirits. I know the songs that get the most views on YouTube. I am afraid that when I am old, I will have nothing real to pass down to my children."

This psychological bifurcation manifests physically. During participant observation, it was noted that the artists' body language shifted dramatically between the Asol Porbo and the Dekhano Porbo. In the ritual context, the movements were fluid, spontaneous, and deeply engrossing. In the commercial context, the movements were exaggerated, timed to the second, and accompanied by fixed, frozen smiles. The artists described feeling "empty" after commercial performances, contrasting this with the "fullness" and "peace" they felt after ritual performances.

The Impact of Digital Media and Heritage Festivals

The study also reveals the paradoxical role of digital media. On one hand, platforms like YouTube have allowed Toto and Rabha musicians to reach a global diaspora, providing direct income and a sense of pride. A Rabha folk fusion band, for instance, has gained significant traction online by mixing traditional melodies with electronic beats. The lead singer stated, "The internet saved us. We no longer have to depend on the local government for grants. We have a global audience."

On the other hand, the algorithmic demand for "exotic" content forces artists to engage in self-orientalism. They emphasize the most visually striking, "tribal" aspects of their culture while downplaying the mundane, agricultural realities of their lives. The algorithm rewards the spectacular, the primitive, and the picturesque. One artist noted, "If I post a video of me working in the tea garden, no one watches. If I post a video of me in traditional attire dancing with a fire torch, I get thousands of views. So, I have to become a character. State-sponsored heritage festivals often perpetuate this anxiety. The bureaucratic requirement to submit "authentic" folk performances for funding forces artists to codify fluid, evolving traditions into rigid, repeatable scripts. As one Toto interviewee noted, "The government wants the 'old' Toto. If I sing a new song about climate change or the displacement of our people, they say it is not authentic folk. So, I must act like a museum piece to get the money. We are becoming artifacts in our own lifetime." This external pressure to remain "frozen in time" creates a profound existential dilemma. The artists are told that their value lies in their antiquity, not their contemporaneity. This denies them the right to evolve, to respond to modern crises, and to create art that reflects their current reality. The anxiety here is not just about losing the past, but about being denied a future.

Economic Realities and the Anxiety of Survival

While the psychological burden of "authenticity" is the primary focus of this paper, it is crucial to contextualize it within the stark economic realities of North Bengal. For many of these artists, folk performance is not a hobby or a side hustle; it is the primary means of survival. The decline of traditional agrarian livelihoods, coupled with the closure of tea gardens in the Dooars, has forced many indigenous youth to look toward cultural tourism as an economic lifeline.

The anxiety of authenticity is therefore deeply intertwined with the anxiety of survival. An artist cannot afford to reject a commercial gig simply because it feels spiritually inauthentic; the income from that gig puts food on the table. This creates a painful moral compromise. One middle-aged Rabha woman, who weaves and performs, stated, "I know it is not the real thing. But what can I do? My husband is sick. The tourism money is the only money we have. I sell my culture to buy rice. Is that wrong?" This economic precarity exacerbates the psychological bifurcation. The artists are forced to commodify their heritage to survive, and then are often shamed by outsiders or community elders for "selling out." This double bind—the need to sell and the guilt of selling—creates a toxic psychological environment. The "Authenticity Anxiety" is thus not just a philosophical crisis; it is a material one.

Gender and the Bifurcated Self

The experience of bifurcation is also deeply gendered. Female folk artists in North Bengal face a unique set of pressures. In traditional settings, women's roles in folk performance are often circumscribed by ritual purity and community modesty. However, in the commercial tourism and digital media spheres, women are often expected to perform in ways that are more "spectacular," which can sometimes clash with local cultural norms. A female Rajbanshi dancer explained, "In the village, I dance with my sisters. It is respectful. On the stage, the organizers ask us to wear brighter costumes, to dance faster, to look at the audience and smile. My father-in-law saw a video of my stage performance and was very angry. He said I looked like a bar dancer, not a folk artist. But the organizers say this is what the tourists want." This creates a heightened state of anxiety for female artists, who must navigate the competing demands of patriarchal community norms and the commercialized expectations of the tourism industry. They are often the most vulnerable to the psychological toll of bifurcation, as their bodies become the site of the most intense cultural conflict.

Coping Mechanisms and Resilience

Despite the pervasive anxiety, the folk artists of North Bengal are not passive victims. The study identified several coping mechanisms and strategies of resilience.

Firstly, artists engage in what we might call "strategic essentialism" (Spivak 205). They knowingly perform an exaggerated, stereotypical version of their culture for external consumption, while reserving the "real" rituals for the privacy of their communities. They maintain a sharp mental boundary between the Dekhano Porbo and the Asol Porbo. While this boundary is psychologically taxing, it also acts as a protective mechanism, allowing them to preserve the sanctity of their inner spiritual life.

Secondly, artists are increasingly forming collectives and cooperatives. These collectives serve not only as economic bargaining units but also as support networks. Artists use these spaces to vent their frustrations, share their anxieties, and strategize on how to navigate the demands of the market without completely losing their cultural integrity. A collective of Toto artists in the Alipurduar district, for example, has established a strict code of conduct for commercial performances, ensuring that certain sacred songs are never performed outside the village.

Finally, some artists are actively subverting the demand for "authenticity" by creating new, hybrid forms of art that speak to their contemporary reality. A younger generation of Rabha musicians is blending folk lyrics with hip-hop beats, addressing issues of climate change, land rights, and mental health. These artists are challenging the notion that "authentic" folk must be ancient and unchanging. They are creating a "living authenticity" that is rooted in the past but engaged with the present.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The folk artists of North Bengal are not merely passive victims of globalization; they are active agents negotiating a complex cultural terrain. However, the psychological cost of this negotiation—the "Authenticity Anxiety" resulting from the bifurcation of the ritual and commodified self—is a pressing concern that has been largely ignored by cultural economists and policymakers. The pressure to perform a static, exoticized version of identity for external consumption, while simultaneously navigating economic precarity and community expectations, creates a significant mental health burden.

To mitigate this anxiety, this paper recommends a three-pronged approach.

First, there is a need for a shift from "preservation" to "empowerment" in cultural policy. Cultural policies should not demand static authenticity but should instead fund the living, evolving nature of folk traditions. Governments and cultural institutions must recognize that folk art is not a museum piece but a dynamic, living practice that changes with the community. Funding should be directed toward artists who are innovating and adapting their traditions to contemporary realities, not just those who perform the most "traditional" versions.

Second, there is an urgent need for psychological counseling and community support networks tailored specifically for cultural workers navigating the pressures of the modern heritage industry. Cultural organizations, NGOs, and state agencies must collaborate to provide mental health resources for folk artists. This includes not only therapy but also peer support groups where artists can share their experiences of bifurcation and develop collective coping strategies.

Third, there is a need for greater awareness and education among consumers of folk art—tourists, digital audiences, and urban elites. The demand for "authentic" and "exotic" performances is what drives the commodification of culture. By educating consumers about the dynamic, evolving nature of folk traditions, we can create a market that values artistic innovation and psychological well-being over static, exoticized performances.

Only by addressing the inner psychological landscape of the artist can we ensure the genuine, holistic survival of North Bengal's intangible cultural heritage. The anxiety of authenticity is not just an individual problem; it is a symptom of a global cultural system that values the spectacle of the past over the lived reality of the present. It is time to listen to the voices of the artists themselves, and to build a cultural economy that nourishes rather than fractures the human spirit.

Works Cited

Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

Basu, Kaushik. The Cultural Geography of North Bengal: Tribes, Traditions, and Transitions. Kolkata: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.

MacCannell, Dean. The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. "Can the Subaltern Speak?" Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988, pp. 271-313.